This may be a dumb request, but would it be possible to add "How to make a link" to the other html tricks in the how-to section?

Maybe we need a whole section in the FAQ to deal with the various Natter strategies. In addition to mearaing, we could have an explanation of the John H Natter diet (what is it? Read Beep Me and COMM and the last 50 posts of Natter, I think.)

And "Did you skim? I think you skipped and skimmed."

Love this! Also, for keeping up in the show threads, the importance of Nillytown.

I've realized why I think skipping and skimming is so important -- it makes me so sad when people say that they've been trying to catch up all week -- that's a week we could have had them natter with us!

Natter has gotten so fast, and so many posts that I'm finding it really hard to deal. What I would like is to contract my reading out of Natter to someone so I could get a Reader's Digest abridged, something like "PMM is sick and there was an extensive discussion on snot."

I need a Natter abstract. Or something like that?

Cause I don't want to have to unsub and miss natter completely. I just find it really hard to catch up on 300+ messages each day. Or am I the only one with this problem?

The Natter abstract would be very cool. I tend to use a variety of the John H diet myself. Read the page where I left off then the last couple pages. If I am substantially confused about the current topic I use the search function to find the beginning of the discussion.

I try not to skip in the Bitches and NAFDA threads unless I am out of town or something. Natter is impossible for me to not skip. Hours in the day issue.

Heh. See, the only reason I can keep up in natter (long as I have to make my catchups because of the number of posts I read at a time) is because I tend to NOT keep up in the show threads...

It is a shame there is no way to do an automated Natter abstract. But if ita or Jon had an AI algorithm that good, they would be selling it for large amounts of money. As it is, we need a volunteer with lots of spare time.

Didn't we talk about dividing Natter up into blocks of time? One person recaps Natter from noon to 3 on Wednesdays, another has it from seven to ten on Fridays, and so on.

Natter recaps would be too dang labor intensive, wouldn't they?

Natter recaps would be too dang labor intensive, wouldn't they?

Also, I don't want to be recapped. I'm not comfortable with the idea, myself.

Maybe it's just me, but I think that COMM catches most of the highlights. And frankly, if you disagree, it just means you need to post more highlights there yourself!