Marco: Do we look reasonable to you? Mal: Well. Looks can be deceiving. Jayne: Not as deceiving as a low down dirty... deceiver.

'Out Of Gas'


Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


P.M. Marc - Jan 27, 2003 10:23:37 am PST #3589 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

I wondered this during the music discussions, because there seem to be a few fan fiction threads, etc., but since I don't visit them, I didn't bring it up.

FFRWE = Discussion only, no workshopping.

Bitchy Fic = active workshopping thread, Buffycentric.

PPO = not-so-much-active workshopping thread that once was hopping but has declined in recent months as the show has lost some fandom types. Also, our most active Smallville writers have gone dim.

I'd like to keep Bitchy Fic separate, but would be fine seeing PPO go polyfandom.


Jesse - Jan 27, 2003 10:25:57 am PST #3590 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I'd like to keep Bitchy Fic separate, but would be fine seeing PPO go polyfandom.

Could that incorporate due South, too?

Please note, I'm not sure why I'm even concerned about having a lot of lightly-used threads, so if the people who participate like the status quo, and there's no real reason to change, don't bother.


P.M. Marc - Jan 27, 2003 10:27:40 am PST #3591 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Due South isn't workshopping, and is active enough. It's already pretty open season slashy.

Smallville has been more active lately. Back when Smallville was its own part of WX, we started Due South to keep Smallville talk on Smallville.


§ ita § - Jan 27, 2003 10:27:41 am PST #3592 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

facilitate the other types of conversations.

But for this you need a lot of spread, don't you? For every topic people have felt "damn, I wish this hadn't been diluted by ita talking about krav"? Where do you stop? That's exactly my proliferation issue.

Someone (say, like me) who wants to talk with a number of people about a number of things, but will not be able to handle the increased volume with proliferation gets relegated to the natteriest of natter.

I don't see boundaries ... that's my thing.


Jessica - Jan 27, 2003 10:32:49 am PST #3593 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

What kinds of conversations are people missing in Natter, exactly? And why aren't the people who miss the deep conversations starting them up again? If the ratio of chitchat:Real Conversation has gotten too high, it's because the people who want more Real Conversations are waiting for the chit-chatters to start them, IMO. I don't think thread spread is the answer.


Jesse - Jan 27, 2003 10:34:00 am PST #3594 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I also think that too many of the Real Topics on people's minds these days are too touchy and devisive to talk about much.


Theodosia - Jan 27, 2003 10:39:36 am PST #3595 of 10001
'we all walk this earth feeling we are frauds. The trick is to be grateful and hope the caper doesn't end any time soon"

t clutches Due South topic close to bosom because it is nice just the way it is


Susan W. - Jan 27, 2003 10:51:36 am PST #3596 of 10001
Good Trouble and Righteous Fights

What kinds of conversations are people missing in Natter, exactly? And why aren't the people who miss the deep conversations starting them up again?

With me, I feel like I try to start/continue deep or just semi-serious conversations with longer posts, but it often doesn't work. I'm not sure thread proliferation is the answer either. I guess I'm just going through one of those inevitable "I feel invisible" phases. (They are inevitable, right? I'm not the only one who sometimes feels invisible?) And I don't mean that anywhere near as whiny as it sounds. I think it's just another case of board growing pains, change we can't control, etc.

I also think that too many of the Real Topics on people's minds these days are too touchy and devisive to talk about much.

And while I can kinda understand that, I still really hate it.


askye - Jan 27, 2003 11:15:46 am PST #3597 of 10001
Thrive to spite them

I'm with Theo--don't mess with Due South!


Lyra Jane - Jan 27, 2003 11:35:12 am PST #3598 of 10001
Up with the sun

I admit, I feel like we've had this conversation before, and I don't know what's to be gained by having it again. Some people like having only one thread to read where they can talk about whatever: some people want their discussion areas segregated to facilitate more in-depth discussion. Depending on our moods and who's around, either view can predominate in bureaucracy.

I'm not trying to be pushy (especially given my not-a-stompy status), but I really think the best way to handle this is to develop a streamlined thread proposal system. One model could be:

1. Desired thread is proposed in Bureaucracy, open for discussion for 12 hours.

2. Poll is established. Thread goes to a poll vote for an additional 24 hours.

3. Majority rules at the end of the 36 hours.

At the moment, we have proposals for an Alias thread, a Miracles thread, a general TV thread, a general movies thread, and a foamies '02 thread. I think voting is going to be more useful than a rehash of the whole sprawl discussion.