The hyenas and I are just good friends.
Giles ,'Touched'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Is it possible for admins. to check IP numbers? Each day, my suspicion grows - that we have the subject of a suspension in our midst.
That is so weird Cindy, because I have been thinking the same thing. And then feeling like I am being a paranoid freak (not to say that you are).
The subject came up before. I think the answer was "Not really". IPs aren't unique identifiers for anything other than network purposes, in any case; many people have a different IP address every time they connect to their ISP, and many people can share an IP address because of the way firewalls work.
Actually, I kind of am a paranoid freak, or I'm paranoid about being thought a paranoid freak (same thing, really) - so I also get paranoid about being a paranoid freak.
I've been thinking it for over a week, and feeling like the little kid who just KNOWS the emperor is nekkid, but didn't want to upset the villagers and didn't want to falsely accuse an innocent. Now it seems to be getting to the point where the discussion patterns, the posting style, and the slightly incorrect adoption of posting gimmicks, etc., is so very much the same that it almost can't be another person. However, I have to say, if the person I suspect is the person I suspect s/he is, his/her second incarnation's behavior (when called on posting problems) has been better and (imo) not suspension worthy, in and of itself.
Crap. I hate being delicate. Is the above even in English?
eta...
Oh Betsy, that's right. I'd forgotten. Okay, never mind Buffistas. Either the truth will out and (hopefully) I'll be proven wrong, or it will never out, in which case, we still really don't have a problem.
Cindy-- I think we are the same exact person on this. I understand and agree with all of the above.
Me three. However,
if the person I suspect is the person I suspect s/he is, his/her second incarnation's behavior (when called on posting problems) has been better and (imo) not suspension worthy, in and of itself.
makes me want to err on the side of inaction.
I think I agree Jon, so now I'm not even sure why I brought it up - except it's really hard to stare at a nekkid emperor for too long, without saying something.
me three on the agree.
I think we need to get exhaustive about the spoiler rules, because they're obviously confusing people. I *think* they boil down to:
1. In show threads, mention only topics that have already aired on the show. Nothing you saw in TV Guide (insert existing blurb.) should be mentioned, not even in whitefont. However, if you're mentioning current-season Buffy events on Angel or Angel events on Buffy, use whitefont. Some people are on tape delay for one or both shows.
2. In non-show threads, whitefont spoilers for current-season shows, exciting plot twists in current movies, mentions of R*ley...
3. And, as always, use whitefont for humorous effect. Not that we could stop you.