Bitchy Fic has a warning about explicitness, but I must admit I'm a trifle nervous about under-18 eyes in there. Having Liz read (some of) my stuff would be considered a felony if she did it here in Utah. And I know she has read the NC-17 stuff. That said, I keep the more--interesting items in the threads with warnings on them.
Remember that sex we were planning to have, ever again?
Zoe ,'Our Mrs. Reynolds'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Connie Neil - Dec 26, 2002 7:50:43 pm PST #1465 of 10001
brillig
DXMachina - Dec 26, 2002 7:54:01 pm PST #1466 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Weren't both Holli and RL in about that (sub-14) age range when they first came on board?
You are correct in that (Holli was 12), and both seemed remarkably mature for their ages, but we also didn't own the board then.
amych - Dec 26, 2002 7:56:12 pm PST #1467 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
we also didn't own the board then.
No, we didn't -- and owning the board means legal implications that we didn't have then. I was just thinking along the lines of "don't be afraid to natter now that the chibi-lizard is around, just be aware that some threads are pornier than others."
Connie Neil - Dec 26, 2002 8:02:36 pm PST #1468 of 10001
brillig
If chibi-lizard wanders in the labelled threads, more power to her and may she have one-tenth the cool as her older sister, and all will be well.
DXMachina - Dec 26, 2002 8:05:42 pm PST #1469 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
If chibi-lizard wanders in the labelled threads, more power to her and may she have one-tenth the cool as her older sister, and all will be well.
Plus, the only name on the paperwork is Jesse's, so the rest of us should be in the clear. ;)
Connie Neil - Dec 26, 2002 8:07:22 pm PST #1470 of 10001
brillig
t note to self, change profile name
DavidS - Dec 26, 2002 8:08:51 pm PST #1471 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Worth noting that chibi-lizard is only going on with her big sister guiding her through the threads. So she's not unchaperoned. Though Natter itself gets pretty randy from time to time.
Jesse - Dec 26, 2002 8:09:43 pm PST #1472 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Plus, the only name on the paperwork is Jesse's, so the rest of us should be in the clear. ;)
Eek!! but jengod still owns the domain name, I think....
§ ita § - Dec 26, 2002 8:11:10 pm PST #1473 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
billytea, my ill-worded point was that of course "offensive" means "offensive to us", since unfortunately etiquette lacks ISO standardisation.
No, it's not something we can quantify. And no, it's not something we can even explain.
Sure Rio and MM and folks got down and downright scurrilous with their language. Most important thing there, I think is that a) givers and receivers were both consenting and b) we didn't have to give the benefit of the doubt -- there was no doubt. While this might be confusing for an onlooker I think there is one very important thing -- when a Buffista expressed discomfort, it was stopped with no rankling. It was born, it lived, it died, on to the next fun thing.
As for censoring for kids -- I'd rather not. Because there could be dozens of ten year olds reading right now. How much censorship would we impose? How much warning do we have to give? There's porn here, plain and simple. And no method of keeping anyone out.
John H - Dec 26, 2002 8:14:56 pm PST #1474 of 10001