I just hope we don't have to white font for TTT.
No, no, no, sir. No more chick pit for you. Come on.
Riley ,'Lessons'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Cindy - Dec 21, 2002 1:47:16 am PST #1306 of 10001
Nobody
§ ita § - Dec 21, 2002 6:52:00 am PST #1307 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Some people were white fonting for TTT, and my recommendation is ... no. My reflex is also that book contents are okay, but movie-specific details should be white-fonted. However, if there are enough participants who've not read the book ... well, that's why we made a spoiler font shortcut.
Jessica - Dec 21, 2002 9:38:42 am PST #1308 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
I vote no spoiler font for events in the books.
DavidS - Dec 21, 2002 10:35:01 am PST #1309 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
So are ita and the stompy feet mentioned in the FAQ? Because I think they should be. Like...
Who are ita and the Stompy Feet? Is that an old doo-wop group? Or a gang of roving feral actuaries? Does it hurt to be stomped? I don't wanna be stomped! Hold me, I'm scared.
Then list stompies and their duties and what happens when you natter in no-natter zones, or spoil inadvertently.
bon bon - Dec 21, 2002 11:15:12 am PST #1310 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
Haven't read LotR and don't wish to be spoiled (edit: for RotK) BUT I have a one-year rule on open talk about books and movies so it's my own damn fault for not reading it-- I'm skimming with my hands over my eyes.
Consuela - Dec 21, 2002 3:45:53 pm PST #1311 of 10001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
Can we get a link to Firefly: IA in the headers of the Firefly thread?
Cindy - Dec 21, 2002 5:52:32 pm PST #1312 of 10001
Nobody
The only thing I'd like to see spoiler fonted in the LotR Thread is future Return of the King film spoilers.
The books have been out for what?... 50 years or so. The thread was created to discuss the film, The Two Towers, so to me, spoiler fonting FotR or TTT (books, films and/or comparisons) seems contrary to the purpose of the thread. I think the RotK book should also be fair game (no white font required) too, even though I haven't read it completely and haven't even skimmed it recently. t /two cents
§ ita § - Dec 21, 2002 6:44:58 pm PST #1313 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
There's no way to get an adequate read on how many lurkers were have here, but currently we have 546 registered users. 505 activated their accounts, 472 have logged in to read at least one post, and 302 have posted.
Jen - Dec 21, 2002 8:31:03 pm PST #1314 of 10001
love's a dream you enter though I shake and shake and shake you
Would it be possible to add a list of threads in which whitefonting is OK to the FAQ, in the "what the heck is whitefont" description?
The whitefont that happens in the show threads sometimes has real spoilers and sometimes has whitefont because people are joking around, so a spoilerphobe like myself isn't ever sure whether to read it or not. It would be great to have a no-whitefont-in-the-show-threads-not-even-a-little-we're-so-not-kidding rule mentioned in the FAQ.
§ ita § - Dec 21, 2002 8:39:29 pm PST #1315 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I'm very against whitefonting being disallowed in any thread. If someone wants to mention something current on AtS in the Buffy thread, they have to whitefont.
Content is the issue -- if there are no spoilers for the show in hand posted, then you know exactly what you're highlighting -- playing around, or spoilers for other works. Which should be labelled as such.