It's like a stompfest.
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Why are we announcing thread creation in Press?
I just figured it would be less likely to get lost there. Didn't think it was inappropriate, but I'll bow to the will of the hive.
It's just that we've never done it before. I don't think it's needed, myself.
I thought the previous thread was usually closed with a link to the new one...?
It's just that we've never done it before. I don't think it's needed, myself.
I kind of like it. If a person uses 'Read New' to make their way around this place, they could theoretically never know a new thread's been created. (Less of an issue with continuations, presumably, but we do occasionally get new topics.) Having the announcements in a single thread might be not such a bad idea.
My reflex is that if one navigates by read new exclusively, then one doesn't care (edit: much). Continuations are linked at the ends of threads, new threads are discussed and named and announced here.
I navigate by read new exclusively, and I care quite a bit!
It's just that we've never done it before.
Errr.... I did it last week for the Secret Santa thread: Jon B "Sunnydale Press" Dec 9, 2002 3:11:03 pm EST
I navigate by read new exclusively, and I care quite a bit!
But you read here, so you know when a new thread is created. I assumed that people who cared when new threads come about would read where they're created, or scan the list periodically.
Otherwise it's an inefficient sort of caring, bound for disappointment.
Jon, why don't we pretend we're having this discussion last week, then. I must have skimmed past (and, sue me, I do, sometimes, but I didn't know I'd be missing board-specific announcements by doing so. I thought those were here).