I just don't see the good side of inserting yourself into the story. I don't wanna be in the story. I want to read about people in the story, or the fandom or whatever.

I think it also goes into writing styles. I usually write really dense, lyrical (almost poetic) prose with a lot of description and moodiness and crap like that. That style doesn't correspond as easily with first person (I might argue that it doesn't at all) as it does with third person o and simple, and second person.

Yeah-- to write like that in first person, you'd have to find a character who believably thought or spoke like that.

See, I see the whole story, and I have to work out how to tell it through one person's eyes, and how to use that filter to add, not subtract from the narrative and emotional impact.

You start with plot, and head for character; I go the other way. I still get a kick out of unreliable narration at times, though.

You start with plot, and head for character

No, that's not what I meant to say. I have both. But with first person POV, there's Sue's character, which I get, and there's Jim's character, which I get. Thinking about filtering Sue's character through Jim's? That's where I go.

All narration is unreliable. That doesn't have to be a point of the story, but it's still unreliable. If it's unfiltered, presented as just a subset of knowledge -- that's not a character. That's just where the camera was positioned when it all went down.

I just don't see the good side of inserting yourself into the story.

ita's was lovely.

I just don't see the good side of inserting yourself into the story. I don't wanna be in the story. I want to read about people in the story, or the fandom or whatever.

Ignoring Mary-Sues, for the time being: *you* aren't in the story. You're being given a chance to be one of the fandom characters in the story. There's a difference, which I'm not sure I can explain clearly, between putting yourself into the story, and becoming someone who was in the story already.

Another thing about second person, for me, is that it's great for the writer, who can just say to the character "you do this, you do that" but harsh on the reader, who is faced, if their brain works the way mind does, with trying to be the one ordered around.

This is a bit deeper than just which person you're using. When I read a story for pleasure, I'm reading as an escape, to be someone who is not me, to be someone who is leading a different life and has a different world view. Their life and thoughts are interesting purely because they are different to mine, and by trying to experience, through reading, someone else's life, I am learning about how other people work, and by comparision, about myself.

I suspect that this is not the case for everybody.

First person rocks. So does second person. Done right, sometimes I don't even consciously notice what POV a story's in, because the story just sucks me in.

I just read Dana's fic. Holy COW that's hot. I couldn't imagine Weiss and hot in the same sentence, but, wow.

Hee! Teddy bear Weiss! You know he deserved to get some loving.

ita's was lovely.

Oh, it was. That was the kind of blanket statement that happens when there's no coffee.

Another thing about second person, for me, is that it's great for the writer, who can just say to the character "you do this, you do that" but harsh on the reader, who is faced, if their brain works the way mind does, with trying to be the one ordered around.

For me, it's not ordering. It's experiencing.

When I read a story for pleasure, I'm reading as an escape, to be someone who is not me, to be someone who is leading a different life and has a different world view. Their life and thoughts are interesting purely because they are different to mine, and by trying to experience, through reading, someone else's life, I am learning about how other people work, and by comparision, about myself.

This is second person for me.

And I do the same thing, I just don't do it well with first person.

No, that's not what I meant to say. I have both. But with first person POV, there's Sue's character, which I get, and there's Jim's character, which I get. Thinking about filtering Sue's character through Jim's? That's where I go.

Okay, misunderstanding. We're very different; I can occassionally being with plot and work from there, but mostly I start with character, already filtered, add situation, which may invovled working out some things that the character doesn't know, and wind up with plot, if I'm lucky.

All narration is unreliable. That doesn't have to be a point of the story, but it's still unreliable. If it's unfiltered, presented as just a subset of knowledge -- that's not a character. That's just where the camera was positioned when it all went down.

Yes; first person, narration, is filtered, and may have missed important stuff. Third person omnisonedayIwilllearntospellthisent has a responsiblity to make sure the camera sees the important stuff, which tends to feel to me like too much working out before starting on the telling.

For me, it's not ordering. It's experiencing.

I find just the opposite -- which is why this may come down to a different strokes thing. I'm used to people saying to me, "I did this." It's a normal conversational mode; when I run into it in narrative, I can hear it as that person telling me their story.

If someone says to me "you did this," my immediate instinct is to say, "who the fuck are you to tell me my own experiences? Step off!" It's not what I've experienced -- it's what I'm being told I should experience. So, yeah, it reads like an order. Or like a huge stinkin' presumption. Either way, the story has to be damned good to get around the severe hackles-raised reaction.

For me, it's not ordering. It's experiencing.

To me, it sounds like ordering (edit: or, like amych just said, a huge presumption). I have a much easier time experiencing if it's 'I' statements than if it's 'you' statements.

I have no idea why this is, and I think my analysis button is broken.