Got a question about technology? Ask it here. Discussion of hardware, software, TiVos, multi-region DVDs, Windows, Macs, LINUX, hand-helds, iPods, anything tech related. Better than any helpdesk!
So, why does Apple think it is a good concept to have a non-removable battery? Does anyone have information about this?
It kind of drives me crazy in the ipod and I think it is a BAD IDEA for the laptop. Carrying around an extra battery for my MacBook Pro has saved my bacon any number of times.
So, why does Apple think it is a good concept to have a non-removable battery?
60% increase in battery life without getting any thicker or heavier.
According to the keynote, making it non-removable was the trade-off for the 8 hour battery life.
yeah, how long will it remain 8-hours?
So, why does Apple think it is a good concept to have a non-removable battery? Does anyone have information about this?
I'm a pretty serious power user, I've owned easily a dozen Mac Laptops, from the 145b up to my current. I have only had spare batteries on the very earliest models. On the past half a dozen machines I've never removed the battery. I suspect that my behavior is close to the norm for most users. The removable battery seems like a nice thing, but most people never ever use it.
Also, those bastards want me to pay an additional $50 for a matte display. Either way I'll probably be preordering shortly.
Am loving iTunes going DRM-free.
I foresee a gizmo that has a maglock connection, and a rechargeable battery brick to it.
Am loving iTunes going DRM-free.
I assume that doesn't apply to what one has already purchased, or does it?
The removable battery seems like a nice thing, but most people never ever use it.
I would say that 90% of the times I've removed the battery from my laptops it's been to crash it when it's frozen or otherwise fucked. I understand that that's not such an issue for the Mac users among us. But never?