Jesse, That IS a good discussion.

It nearly swayed me to the Panasonic HC-V700M but it looks like compatibility with a Mac requires a bit of work-around.

Hey! I found a new in box flip on ebay.

Now I just have to wait three days to see if I win it.

I'm sad to find that Blue actually created a high-quality external mic for the flip but discontinued it as well.

None on ebay. BOO.

In yet another installment of the "Bonny Show" (sorry), I found a fairly good deal on the Impact Daylight Two-Floodlight Light Kit that actually rivals the price of the smaller lights you can attach to your camera tripod.

Is it foolish to use floodlights for video production? The vlogging guru I'm following suggests them, but it's his primary business.

My main concern, believe it or not, is storage space. The wall I'm using for the stand up is in my office, so the lights will have to be put away...in storage space my 1860 built home doesn't really have.

Argh! Flash is my nemesis. *shakes tiny fist* I'm working on eLearning courses for students whose computers have no internet access. As in, Kenya back country, takes days to get there in a Land Rover, we're happy to have electricity thank you forget broadband or narrowband or any internet whatsoever, no internet access. The courses are done in Articulate and require Flash. So, like a good little IP respecting person I got permission from Adobe to download an installer that goes on the CD so people whose computers were donated in 2002 and have no flash plug-ins can just install it from the CD and take the course. We tested the CD today on a non-networked computer and the browser won't recognize that it exists. We get a pop-up message saying to go to Adobe to download the plug in. Which many of our students cannot do. I am so annoyed by Adobe right now. Why not just say "Sorry, if you're not online you're screwed," instead of wasting my time downloading and attempting installs?

Suggestions would be lovely, but mostly I'm posting to rant to a thread where it seems semi-appropriate.

Looks like Jessica was right regarding the Kindle fire sale.

Amazon announces new wave of Kindles:

The Kindle Paperwhite will feature 62 percent more pixels than the Kindle Touch, Bezos said. It will have a touchscreen and be lit with a fiber-optic lighting system that has been in development for four years, he said.

Right after I get a new Kindle Touch and buy a lighted case, dammit!

A new feature called Time to Read will estimate, based on the reader's speed turning previous pages, how long it will take to finish the current chapter or the entire book.

ZOMG THIS IS THE GREATEST FEATURE. One of the things I don't like about e-readers is how it's difficult to tell how much you have left in a chapter.

The more traditional, non-touchscreen Kindle will remain available, with its price dropping to $69 for the ad-supported version.

Well, I will still be happy with my oldfangled Kindle. FOR NOW.

One of the things I don't like about e-readers is how it's difficult to tell how much you have left in a chapter.

How do you tell this simply with a normal book? And...why?

How do you tell this simply with a normal book?

Flip ahead, analog-style.

And...why?

Because...I don't know, I just want to know. No big reason.

Boony I'd try it without the lights first and see how you like the result.

Because I need to know how much longer it is until I have a good stopping point. If I only have a few pages, I can keep going; if this chapter is really long, then I might as well stop mid-chapter if I need to. Or I might need to adjust my reading speed so that I end the chapter by the time I reach my destination.

And...why?

Usually for 'do I finish this chapter before I go to sleep or just stop reading right now' purposes.