The Top 10 Marvel Comics of the 1970s.
I had every single one of those.
The Seventies were weird.
Pfft, and they didn't even include Killraven or Warlock or Deathlok the Destroyer.
Willow ,'Same Time, Same Place'
Discussion of comics, graphic novels, and more. Except for capes. No capes!
Please use spoiler font for new releases until after the weekend following release.
The Top 10 Marvel Comics of the 1970s.
I had every single one of those.
The Seventies were weird.
Pfft, and they didn't even include Killraven or Warlock or Deathlok the Destroyer.
or Howard the Duck.
I read all of those, too, including Howard, Killraven and Deathlok! Though I loved Barry Smith's art better than Buscema's in Conan, I loved his work in the other books.
Savage Sword of Conan was officially my first comic--thanks to my older cousin. Between that and his copies of the John Carter series, he single handedly got me into comics and sci-fi when I was 11.
Savage Sword of Conan was officially my first comic--thanks to my older cousin. Between that and his copies of the John Carter series, he single handedly got me into comics and sci-fi when I was 11.
Hey, that's what I was doing when I was 11!
Clowes is a true connoisseur of bitterness. Love his stories about Capp, Hogarth, Ditko and Wood.
That Ditko story was just perfect.
Finally reading through Scott Pilgrim (just finished vol 4). I'm enjoying it, but the art bugs a bit. It's really hard to tell which character is which sometimes, especially in group scenes.
Having seen the movie first, I've been surprised by how much got changed. Cuts were expected, you just can't cram 6 graphic novels into one movie, but the plot changes caught me off guard a bit.
Lucas Lee's book vs. movie personality is probably one of the more notable character changes. Which means in the book Scott sort of comes across as a dick for how he defeats Lucas, whereas in the movie you felt like he had it coming. (I also think the Stunt Team fight in the movie worked really well.)
I was wondering if Roxy had gotten short shrift in the movie, and not really. She's really obnoxious and non-nonsensical in the book, too. Though the changes to her fight with Scott, and transposing the method of defeating of Envy onto her in the movie are problematic, to say the least.
Ramona definitely got shorted in the movie. She has a lot more personality and agency in the books. As ita, I think, said, it's good thing Mary Elizabeth Winstead gives good glare.
ETA: I really enjoyed the movie, and still think it's great. It just failed in some places the books succeeded. Though I suppose I should reserve final judgment until I finish the last two volumes.