Math has a liberal bias.
Because of the quotas?
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Math has a liberal bias.
Because of the quotas?
c) 13 is a dummy. No matter what other combination of votes occurs, what 13 does won't change the outcome.
Poor 13.
If only Strega were here when we had the preferential voting kerfuffle of aught-foo.
Math has a liberal bias.
And that, Mr. Rove, is the REAL math!
Math has a liberal bias.
This explains why increasing military spending and cutting taxes doesn't reduce the deficit. It's that damn liberal math. Also, I hear math is gay.
There's no stopping math.
See my edit. Don't stop the math!
Because of the quotas?
Yup. I think so.
Thanks, Strega. Do you mean "2" for the quota? I don't think that can be it, because I think the quota is the number of votes necessary to pass a measure. But the other stuff makes sense.
My head's gonna explode.
Now on Amazon: Carl Rove's Math, 98% off....
If only Strega were here when we had the preferential voting kerfuffle of aught-foo.
I actually brought that up in class, and my prof was quite intrigued that a community would seriously discuss that type of voting system.
I don't think that can be it, because I think the quota is the number of votes necessary to pass a measure.
That sounds like it is it, then, if each person is one vote (with a varying weight), no?
Don't we have anyone around here who lives in a co-op? This sounds like co-op board voting to me.