Math has a liberal bias.
This explains why increasing military spending and cutting taxes doesn't reduce the deficit. It's that damn liberal math. Also, I hear math is gay.
Mal ,'Jaynestown'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Math has a liberal bias.
This explains why increasing military spending and cutting taxes doesn't reduce the deficit. It's that damn liberal math. Also, I hear math is gay.
There's no stopping math.
See my edit. Don't stop the math!
Because of the quotas?
Yup. I think so.
Thanks, Strega. Do you mean "2" for the quota? I don't think that can be it, because I think the quota is the number of votes necessary to pass a measure. But the other stuff makes sense.
My head's gonna explode.
Now on Amazon: Carl Rove's Math, 98% off....
If only Strega were here when we had the preferential voting kerfuffle of aught-foo.
I actually brought that up in class, and my prof was quite intrigued that a community would seriously discuss that type of voting system.
I don't think that can be it, because I think the quota is the number of votes necessary to pass a measure.
That sounds like it is it, then, if each person is one vote (with a varying weight), no?
Don't we have anyone around here who lives in a co-op? This sounds like co-op board voting to me.
This sounds like co-op board voting to me.
It also, apparently, is used with stockholders and the UN Security Council.
Got anyone here that's on the UN Security Council?
Also, I hear math is gay.
Wait, was that on the Gay Agenda? The one that's posted in the Gay Lobby?
I actually brought that up in class, and my prof was quite intrigued that a community would seriously discuss that type of voting system.
Dear Professor. Meet Australia.
Dear Professor. Meet Australia.Or, for some reason, Cambridge MA.
Got anyone here that's on the UN Security Council?
China?
Actually, I think China just lurks.