but is the whole point of this story "I'm an obsessive who can't rest until I've solved my math problems"? because, much was we all love you for it, how is that going to distinguish you as an applicant from the other mathy people?

Very good point. I think I need to somehow make it less "obsessive" and more "dedicated," or something. And I think that shrinking that section and expanding the rest about my specific interests might do that. Maybe if I put in some more about what I'm working on now, since it's more representative of what I want to concentrate in in grad school, anyway.

Deletes in // // and additions in (( )). Mind you, I haven't the faintest clue about your subject, so if I ruin the line of thought, ignore me.

While doing research at the REU at Cal Poly this past summer, I worked on a progam in Maple to produce Mahonian statistics for various placement rules. I had worked out programs for most of the simple rules, but the more complicated ones gave me trouble. One Friday afternoon, I //figured out how to get the program to run properly. I// started inputting some numbers as the variables, and I generated a fairly large table of output. My partner and I spent a few hours analyzing this data, //and we came up with a few conjectures based on the patterns we saw. Some of the patterns we saw were approximately what we had expected,// but //others// ((some of the patterns)) didn’t seem to make much sense.

((As)) My partner and I discussed the problem //over dinner. I commented that the numbers just didn’t make sense.// ((,)) I went over the algorithm for the program in my head, trying to figure out why that process was producing those numbers. Then I realized//:// ((that)) the algorithm I was considering actually wasn’t the one in the program. I’d included an incremental in one loop when it should have been in a different one. The data we had been analyzing all afternoon were completely invalid.

I decided that I’d take some time over the weekend to work out the flowchart for the program, and then fix the code Monday morning. I finished the flowchart by Saturday night, //and figured that I’d take some time off to go into town on Sunday.// ((but by)) Sunday morning//, though,// I realized that I couldn’t just let the incorrect program and data sit on the hard drive when I knew how to fix it. ((Or maybe something like: "but by Sunday I was itching to fix the code" For some more urgency)) I went to my office and corrected the code, then ran enough input through to have a fairly good output table and a conjecture to discuss with my partner and our advisor Monday morning.

I think that that sort of drive to make things work and make sense is why I am so interested in math. I love the feeling of completing a proof and getting all the variables to fall into their proper places, and I’m willing to work hard and puzzle over things until I can figure them out.

One of the reasons that Berkeley is my first-choice school is the option to concentrate in Foundations of Mathematics and the strong logic program. The course that I’ve found the most interesting as an undergraduate was a graduate-level course I took in mathematical foundations of science. My first-semester project for Senior Seminar deals with lattices and order, and I plan to base my second-semester thesis on some topic in foundations of math. Also, I have been president of the Tulane branch of Women in Science since sophomore year. I’ve appreciated the support structure this organization created, and I’ve tried to have at least one program dealing with women in mathematics each year, so I would be very interested in being involved with the Noetherian Ring. ((Comment: This paragraph is more difficult, but I think you could drop the sentence about the graduate-level course? And maybe drop the phrase in the last sentence about having programs dealing with women. Depends on how important that is to you.))

Don't know if this halves your word count, but I hope it gives you some ideas to work with. Good luck!

Testing to see if we can actually do strikeout tags here: deleted stuff regular stuff inserted stuff

Testing to see if we can actually do strikeout tags here: deleted stuff regular stuff inserted stuff

Heh. I've joined some online crit groups - the //(())// habit's pretty well ingrained by now. If it's confusing, my apologies.

Oh, no implied criticism at all, sorry, didn't mean it that way. I was just wondering aloud if strikeout was a legal tag.

Thanks, Ms. H. I've gone through and made just about all the revisions you suggested, and then found a bunch more things that should be taken out based on RL and John's comments. I think i've gotten the beginning part down to reasonable length now, so that it doesn't become the whole focus of the essay. (I think I'm going to leave in the part about women in science, because just about every math department web page has a huge "WE STRONGLY ENCOURAGE APPLICATIONS FROM WOMEN AND MINORITIES" message, and a few of my professors have said that being female will give me an edge. One of the people I'm sending the next draft of this to is a friend of the family who's a professor at UVA, so I'll ask him what he thinks I should do with that.)

Y'know what? I think I can get the whole opening thing down to about four sentences, which would make it more of an "opening" and less of a "thing that's taking over the entire essay," and then I'll have a bunch of room to get in more specific stuff about what I've done and why I like Berkeley.

That sounds excellent to me.

I think Rebecca and I agree. But we always agree, right?

Except about schools and trannies, yes.

Except about schools and trannies, yes.

That's it. We disagree only about groups of fish and radios.

Want to launch AIM?

Wouldn't you rather call? I just sent you an email. Let me know and I'll get offline.