Hmm. Maybe change "all-honors valedictorian" to something like "champion pole-vaulting valedictorian slam poet"?
'Sleeper'
The Great Write Way
A place for Buffistas to discuss, beta and otherwise deal and dish on their non-fan fiction projects.
yeah, use that, Holli.
That's got my vote. Anything else, and you'd just have to call them Buckaroo Banzai and be done with it.
I loved the disabled war orphans.
MOVIE POEM II Alanna Simpsontattered habit, out of my throat (it's cheerful) ribbon of blood regard and hooded director until the bars are shifting (they're removing clothing) in the movie -- until it's patterns striping across sand pelican wheeling in circles above our heads this thing is still minstrelsy green and leafing (shoot stalk blade) mannequins standard pole, sticking ingots, traverse bloom in the evening truncheon (and that is what I have,) hall, melodic and posing, or eventual laceration; repetition of body and Richter scale moving orange spray special (if it's at this) dis believe her
I'm writing for a new poetic persona, a character in my mother's new novel.
Do buyers from chain bookstores and big-box stores (Costco, Wal-Mart) ever ask publishers to change the content of a book? Word is that they do this just enough to scare authors and editors to death, but evidence of the practice has been nearly impossible to find.Now comes news that Wal-Mart - or more specifically, Anderson Merchandising, the distributor whose sole client is Wal-Mart - has asked a publisher of romance novels, Dorchester Publishing Co., to change the content of a book to make it more "appropriate." It appears that a buyer at Anderson took one look at advance excerpts from Susan Grant's fourth book, "Contact," a lead romance novel from Dorchester's imprint, LoveSpell, and decided that the airplane hijacking theme of the story was "inappropriate" a year after 9/11. Changes in "editorial content" were requested by Anderson/Wal-Mart, but Dorchester refused, bless 'em. As as a result, "Contact" was declined by Anderson and is not sold in Wal-Mart stores. (Interestingly, it's available through Wal-Mart online, but that seems to be another story.)
(Interestingly, it's available through Wal-Mart online, but that seems to be another story.)
Which sort of implies that it's Anderson and not Wal-Mart that's the problem.
See above. Anderson's sole client is Wal-Mart. We can safely assume that their decisions are not unpalatable to Wal-Mart.
If anybody wants to read my story, it should be here:
Sorry, the html is a bit funky, but I think it can mostly be understood.