It is true that sometimes the obvious, conventional wisdom, type things turn out not to be true, so it's not like the data is meaningless because "everyone knows that!"
Natter 45: Smooth as Billy Dee Williams.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Because sometimes the "everybody knows that!" things turn out to be wrong? (edit: or, what Jesse said)
The two faced cat and the lipsticked fish are both super creepy. Eeek.
I have so far today done an hour long conference call, several emails, and a half-hour long call with someone else for work. I think I'm ready for bed. :)
But I don't think tone is conventional wisdom. I do think it's obvious. Which is why I wonder if the paper's about something more subtle than that.
Isn't there a disorder, for instance, where the hearer can't interpret tone? I have a vague Oliver Sacks memory. That would seem to imply its existence right there.
I'd rather believe I don't get the article than believe that tone has just been discovered, in 2006, way after text-based communication has been shown to lack a certain something that aural interpretation affords.
I have been a moron with my sleep habits this week. Please shoot me.
Isn't there a disorder, for instance, where the hearer can't interpret tone?
autism? or somebody-somebody syndrome? (Tay-Sachs?) hmm
eta: not Tay Sachs, but possibly somebody else-somebody else syndrome
In winter, when gardening gloves are hard to find, Willy doesn't become a mitten kitten. His offseason prey is dirty socks from the laundry room.
Despite his criminal nature, neighbors get a kick out of Willy. Cassone said the cat likes to accompany the mailman up and down the block, all the way to each front door.
Poor Willy. Can he be rehabilitated?
But I don't think tone is conventional wisdom. I do think it's obvious. Which is why I wonder if the paper's about something more subtle than that.
Oh, it is about something more subtle than tone in general -- it's about unconscious tone. People could "hear" if the speaker was looking at something moving fast or slow while they talked.
Isn't there a disorder, for instance, where the hearer can't interpret tone?
Don't a lot of autistics have difficulty interpreting tone and facial expression? Or is that something I made up in my head?
Is this what happens when kittens lose their mittens?