Wash ,'The Message'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Yeah, that whole game is just so offensive, maybe it's not surprising that it's not uniformly liked by the Christian Right. (In the game, Christian soldiers have to either kill or convert everyone else....)
Didn't the Flanders boys used to play that game?
YAY! Imagination Christmas!
t /Flanderses
"the mental molesters of minors for money."
...and now we know what William Safire is doing in his free time. Pro bono press releases for the antically insane!
I was going to tell you not to be such a negative nabob, Nutty, but actually, this is the right thread for that sort of thing.
there is negativity in NATTER! t /league of their own
So, I am ready for today to be over. unfortunately, much more work to get done.
Grammar question. Is it correct to say, "These need to be put into two separate binders and they can be entitled "2006 Stuff."
(Note: I did not say this. It was overheard.)
Aimée, I think that binders can be titled, but I don't think they're entitled to anything.
"These need to be put into two seperate binders and they can be entitled "2006 Stuff."
To me, it seems ambiguous - is the putting into two separate binders required before they can be entitled "2006 stuff," or are the two independent?
edit for spelling....
is the putting into two separate binders required before they can be entitled "2006 stuff"
Yes.
Personally, I think using "entitled" is completely wrong.
The reason I ask, is that the person who said it is very critical of other people's grammar to the point that she won't promote people if it's not up to her standards, yet hers is completely atrocious, at times.
Okay, FTR, today is now totally ON THE LIST.