Okay, could I have picked a profession in which I work myself to exhaustion for a less grateful audience?
I suppose so. I could be a repo man
Oh! Oh! Or a Bail Bondsman!
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Okay, could I have picked a profession in which I work myself to exhaustion for a less grateful audience?
I suppose so. I could be a repo man
Oh! Oh! Or a Bail Bondsman!
Ok. Bitches, enough with the health trama and the bad days! Everyone to our house for taquitos, rice, drinks, ice cream cake and whatever else your little hearts desire. Except for Kristin. She gets soup and gentle hugs.
Um, did everyone except me know that there's a whole hullaballoo going on about LJ suspending users who have breastfeeding icons as their default? The fuck?
Thanks for the advice, Beverly. It's really more for me than for her at this point; I am driving myself a little crazy and I feel like I need to just do something. That probably makes no sense.
ION, I just woke up from a nap. I really overslept, the kitchen is a mess, and there is no way that dinner is going to be ready in 11 minutes.
Um, did everyone except me know that there's a whole hullaballoo going on about LJ suspending users who have breastfeeding icons as their default? The fuck?
I sure didn't, and I second your the fuck?
Everyone to our house for taquitos, rice, drinks, ice cream cake and whatever else your little hearts desire.
My taquitos! t /Gir
I'm eating a vanilla cupcake with pink icing and white sprinkles. It's cute and yummy and matches my outfit! What more could a girl ask for?
Um, did everyone except me know that there's a whole hullaballoo going on about LJ suspending users who have breastfeeding icons as their default? The fuck?
I knew. It's spread everywhere, blogs not LJ based, websites complaining, men with icons showing pictures of their naked nipples and saying it's LJ approved.
According to LJ, the TOS was that no indecent or offensive pictures be used; they added to the FAQ that meant excessively sexual pictures used as default. The current rule has been clarifed to say that no nipple or areolae can be visible. So then it turned into a thing where LJ was discriminating against women who have larger nipples than others (and so possibly a racial issue). It's "only" default pictures. Another bone of contention.
Also, it all started because a guy who was warned for bad behavior spammed LJ abuse with complaints of about 30 women who had those icons in order to stir up this storm. Seems he targeted them specifically because he expected them to be all warriors in arms about it. There have been a number of women suspended since it all started.
I can find links if anyone's interested.
it all started because a guy who was warned for bad behavior spammed LJ abuse with complaints of about 30 women who had those icons in order to stir up this storm.
Man, what an asshole. Please say he's since been suspended himself, please? Even if it's more truthy than actually true?
Um... sure... I can say that.
This is the community most affected: [link]
and this is the journal of the guy who started it all: [link]
The basic background: [link]
Now, I know I'm not a mother or anything, but how in hell can a picture of feeding a child be considered sexual? And no nipple? I assume that means no icons of paintings or sculptures too?
That is whole heap of grey area they are playing with there.