'Sleeper'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
A Toto picture to start the day: [link]
I get to go pick the cutie pie up in a little bit. He's been at my parents' since last Wednesday. I miss him lots and lots. Poor guy also has to go to the vet, though, as it looks like he's developed an ear infection.
billytea, is that the brother *I* get?
Trudy! What are you doing up?
billytea, is that the brother *I* get?
A world of no. This is the one with the case of voluntary Tourette's syndrome.
I stopped, really! I also found a mower on Craigslist and will be picking it up Friday evening.
Good timelies!
I hope the vet visit is fast and painless for you both, vw.
Aidan will be hopping on the bus in a few minutes, and then I'm off to the grocery store.
Cute Toto pic!
Someone smack me repeatedly until I do the work that's already three days late? Please?
We loves Toto!
Gronk. Party was fabulous last night. Too much food and too much drink.
Suzi, congratulations on the laptop!
Jars, go do your work!
I think I'm being irrational this morning about leters to the editor. The paper is running a special series of letters about race relations here in town. Fifty years ago there was a bus boycott and the town has honored this in various ways. The paper is also running letters written at the time both approving of the boycott and calling for equality and letters against the boycott and trying to keep the status quo and pro segregation.
However, all the pro segregation letters printed have been by women and the rebuttal letters have been by men and it just makes me feel uncomfortable, like the women are representing an irrational view point and the men are representing a more rational view point. I ended up sending a quick note to the editor, but ... I worry that I'm being over sensitive.