Here's a bar in England that has a tattoo shop in-house.
Yeah...I like bars, and I like tats, but that just seems like a bad idea.
[eta: Case in point!
I can just imagine some guy at the bar saying, "Dude. I dare ya' to get 'I am a big dork' tatooed on your forehead."]
Currently, if prescription drugs are covered, birth control must be as well.
Is this new? Because the place I worked at five years ago did not cover contraception--I paid full price out of pocket. I never asked about Viagra.
I can just imagine some guy at the bar saying, "Dude. I dare ya' to get 'I am a big dork' tatooed on your forehead."
Seriously. I mean, maayyybe the tattoo staff are hardcore about not doing drunk people, but it seems a little shady.
I remember a very fun conversation once about what it would be like if you actually had to do everything you said you were going to do when you were drunk. Madness!
I've done something useful today. Does that mean I can go home (even though the thing had nothing to do with work) or spend the day shoe shopping?
Perkins, you CANNOT go shoe shopping, you JUST said you had too many shoes.
Read some new to you online blogs or magazines. or go receipe searching for something to cook tonight for dinner.
You have to get rid of some of your old shoes first, Perkins.
[x-post...]
Did msbelle just say post something?
Lalala, I can't hear see her.
You have to get rid of some of your old shoes first, Perkins.
That was the useful thing I did.
Is this new? Because the place I worked at five years ago did not cover contraception--I paid full price out of pocket. I never asked about Viagra.
Did they cover other prescription meds? That may have been right when it was changing. It looks like, in 2000, the EEOC said it was discriminatory to separate contraception from other prescription benefits. That was backed up by a federal court in 2001, which is what really spurred the change.
Though I'm willing to believe that some companies could still be waiting for a lawsuit, or exempt from Title VII for some arcane reason.