I just wanted to lead the Perkins away from thinking anything you said was the be all end all point of something.
Good luck with that--see how she clings?
'Dirty Girls'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I just wanted to lead the Perkins away from thinking anything you said was the be all end all point of something.
Good luck with that--see how she clings?
I'm really glad you cleared that up, msbelle. I see now where I have been confused all this time.
hee. Nice x post with ita, who (I see now) really is just not very nice at all.
Yeah, Jess, I think Guy would be better for the network, too. (I mean, in addition to his food looking yummers.) Although his pilot thing went back somewhat to some of his insider-kitchen thing. I thought Paula was right on with the Mario+Emeril thing.
The one weird thing about that show is that clearly the network doesn't really think the next Food Network star is a chef at all in any way.
The one weird thing about that show is that clearly the network doesn't really think the next Food Network star is a chef at all in any way.
Yep. Which is strange, because most of their hugest stars have three or four restaurants (Mario, Bobby, Emeril). Emeril and Bobby especially are ALL about the zillion-exotic-ingredient dishes. (Hello, pomegranate molasses? WHOSE favorite ingredient is that again, judges??)
Okay, silly Lifetime movie. Question: Is it kosher to, if you're a single mother who's rejected the babydaddy as a boyfriend to go back and beg babydaddy to dump his girlfriend and take you back? That just looks like weird behaviour. Also, I hate that they hinged the conflict on one sentence from babydaddy to make him perfect, and one from the charmer to make him not the guy.
Sounds like a typical Lifetime movie. Was Colin the charmer, or the babydaddy?
Does tomorrow HAVE to be Monday?
Charmer. He was very relaxed. It was fun watching it, even if the movie was irritating.
In critter news, EWWWW. Whitefonted:
An international group of scientists has described an animal that provides nutrition for its young by letting them peel off and eat its skin.
The worm-like amphibian develops a nutritious outer layer of skin, and looks "relaxed" while its young rips it off with their teeth.
The researchers say this kind of parenting has never been seen before in land-living animals.
Oh, that's nasty. Skin is, ironically, crawling.
Good thing about not having children then, isn't it?
Happy Birthday, Drew!