Anya ,'Touched'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Very easily, actually -- I know pently of people for whom the question of God's existance is completely irrelevant.
Yes, of course. So do I, but how could that (which, when leaving out supernatural boils down to "the natural world is either all we've got or all I we can know about") not inform/influence/form the basis for their moral belief? I'm not saying it predicts what the beliefs are. I think that's a naive stance and I find it offensive when I see other theists take it.
Somewhere though, in what you think of the world and how it all works, and why we are here--lies the reason behind your conclusion
This is part of your worldview, though. Why do you believe it must be part of everyone's?
Somewhere though, in what you think of the world and how it all works, and why we are here--lies the reason behind your conclusion that it's best not to be mean.
See, I don't know what that reason is. I don't know where that belief came from.
there's a foundation for your reason that we ought not to be mean, and and some point back, it ties into what you think about world.
Dunno - maybe it's just part of my personality (like my appreciation of hairless cats).
Jess, what's one thing you think is wrong (or usually wrong)?
Jess, what's one thing you think is wrong (or usually wrong)?
I don't think that's relevant either. I want to know why you think there are reasons behind moral judgments.
I don't think that's relevant either. I want to know why you think there are reasons behind moral judgments.I can't even begin to explain that, since any useful meaning of the word "judgment" implies reasoning.
I only asked, because thought I could explain what I meant better, if you gave me an example of your own thoughts on something that's wrong, and why. I can't know, what you think is wrong, or why you think it is wrong, unless you say it. The best I can do is presume, and then, instead of discussing, we'd be playing, "But maybe I don't think that, and so then what."
Can't you argue it in the abstract? With "let's assume Jessica thinks XYZ is wrong"? It's almost distracting with actual deeds plugged in.
Everyone in the world bases moral judgments on beliefs about the supernatural (because beliefs about the supernatural include those who believe nature is the only reality--that is, that there is no supernatural).
Actually, one key conclusion I came to when leaving the church was that my moral judgments would be unaffected by changing my beliefs about the supernatural, and indeed, that this was necessarily the case. If I believed something to be good and I believed in God, but would not believe it to be good absent a belief in God, then my moral judgment and my theistic belief was flawed - as long, of course, as I held to the belief that "God is good".
To put it another way, I came to the conclusion that the moral perspective in my world view was the bedrock; and it did far more in determining the supernatural beliefs I could in all integrity hold than my supernatural beliefs contributed to my morality.
I'd go with Cindy's qualified statements. I think morals depend on a whole bunch of things and religious beliefs or lack thereof are one of them. There's also culture and experience (both collective and individual) and other things. Then the current culture is influenced by religion and religion is influenced by culture and it's just a big mismash.
I think morals depend on a whole bunch of things and religious beliefs or lack thereof are one of them.
You don't think, like BT posits, that morals can determine religious beliefs?