DH read it - but sadly , I'm not sure what he thought of it. When i get his opinion, I'll post it.

Steph, stuff definitely happens. However, there's a needs-a-sequel ending, and the sequel will be out in a few months.

DH read it - but sadly , I'm not sure what he thought of it. When i get his opinion, I'll post it.

He actually posted a comment in my LJ about it.

Steph, stuff definitely happens. However, there's a needs-a-sequel ending

I can live with the need for a sequel (as long as one is forthcoming, which it is), but I'm just really impatient, I guess, for stuff other than gritty street life and crazycrazycrazy to happen.

t edit Plus, the book jacket blurb explicity says that Mildmay and Felix are brought together, which makes my imaptience worse. If I didn't know it was going to happen, I wouldn't be so impatient for the plot to just get to it already.

Oh dear. I spent the night hoping that the Buffistas were wrong about Octavia Butler's death. It was much too soon. She was on the short list of authors whose new books I would instantly buy in hardback, even when that meant eating Ramen for a week.

I just finished her latest (last) book, Fledgling, a vampire novel that isn't quite "Patternmaster Redux" although the main character in each case is a fantastically powerful young black woman with a flock of loyal symbionts.

I shall metaphorically remove my hat and observe a moment of silence while I give thanks for all the pleasure I've gotten from reading her work.

This is interesting. I'm curious about how solid their claim is, though -- I don't know anything about UK copyright law, but my feeling is that if a novel uses information from a nonfiction book as its basis, isn't that considered research, not plaigiarism?

I would have thought so!

If Brown provably lifted the detailed plot from somebody else's work, then it would be infringement (plagiarism isn't actually a legal thing). But if Brown is just a huge hack, who had the same fricken idea as everybody else on the planet, NSM.

Both books contain the idea Jesus had a child.

If that's the extent of the claim, then these authors need to sue Kevin Smith for Dogma as well.

I know there have been legit infringement cases won -- some screenplays in the 80s, e.g. -- but I imagine it's incredibly hard to prove that somebody actually did have and read your book, especially when the content is fairly common material.

See, then they'd lose against Kevin Smith cause I don't see him reading anything that isn't his own work, anyway.

Unless it had pictures.

Wait, what did I miss in Dogma? I thought the Jesus lineage in that movie was through His sibs. Am I on teh crack?

The two books are similar enough that every time someone wants to do a TV special on The Da Vinci Code, they come to us for clips from The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail. (The TV doc based on the book.)

If Brown provably lifted the detailed plot from somebody else's work, then it would be infringement

But nonfiction books don't have plots, is my issue. I just don't see how their claim has any merit.