Wait, what did I miss in Dogma? I thought the Jesus lineage in that movie was through His sibs. Am I on teh crack?
Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
The two books are similar enough that every time someone wants to do a TV special on The Da Vinci Code, they come to us for clips from The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail. (The TV doc based on the book.)
If Brown provably lifted the detailed plot from somebody else's work, then it would be infringement
But nonfiction books don't have plots, is my issue. I just don't see how their claim has any merit.
I thought the Jesus lineage in that movie was through His sibs. Am I on teh crack?
Possibly, or else I am. The Last Scion isn't, like, the scion of the big dude himself? I think it would be a big letdown to be the last scion of the big dude's second cousin. Not even on the divine side!
I'm pretty sure the LS is just a S of the Big Dude's family bloodline. I think. I really need to get my special edition DVD back from my mom.
JZ, you remember as I do, but then, we could both be wrong.
connie, if you liked that book, you might like some stuff by Marcus Borg, specifically Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time which goes into historical Jesus vs. theological Jesus (keeping in mind that Borg is a Christian). He goes into a lot of literary criticism stuff, too.
Rufus made a big point of the unlikelihood of Mary remaining a virgin during all her years of marriage to Joseph, and said the line of the Last Scion went back to Jesus' sibling(s). So, a blessed and free-of-original sin progenitor, but not actual divine origin.
(ps love the thread title.)
Matt is right.
The Great great great great great great great great great grand-niece of Jesus Christ
My understanding is that there is a lot of stuff in DVC that's pretty much only from HBatHG, which had a good number of ideas exclusive to it (no, I don't remember a specific example. Some of the supporting stuff, not just the magdeline duaghter premise)
It's pretty much only the Catholics who insist on the ever-virgin thing. Everybody else takes the line in the Bible about "the brothers of Jesus" at face value.
It's pretty much only the Catholics who insist on the ever-virgin thing.
I kind of wonder about that. I mean, Mary was supposedly married to Joseph after Jesus's birth, right? Aren't married folks kind of supposed to go forth and multiply under Catholic doctrine? How does Mary staying a virgin after His birth make Jesus any more Jesus-y?
I suspect I should corner a nice Jesuit and ask him about this sort of thing.