That's as close to the stereotype of the young 1920s male as you can get.
Hey! What do you two think you're doing? Fightin' at a time like this. You'll use up all the air!
Jayne ,'Out Of Gas'
Literary Buffistas 3: Don't Parse the Blurb, Dear.
There's more to life than watching Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No. Really, there is! Honestly! Here's a place for Buffistas to come and discuss what it is they're reading, their favorite authors and poets. "Geez. Crack a book sometime."
DavidS - May 19, 2012 8:33:42 pm PDT #18842 of 28333
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Typo Boy - May 19, 2012 8:37:31 pm PDT #18843 of 28333
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
Not an affectation in the 60s, at least not a lone affectation. It was a 57 fad be cause of Crockett series, and briefly a an affectation of the transition between beats and hippies. You could see tons of raccoon coats in 62. Was the first fashion excess I ever noticed at age two and three. As late as 67 Mad Magazine was still making fun of raccoon coats.
smonster - May 19, 2012 8:39:17 pm PDT #18844 of 28333
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.
So, for Gorey to be wearing it in the 40s and 50s and 60s was an extreme affectation.
Well, he seemed to be somewhat generally enamored of the aesthetics of the 20s, no?
DavidS - May 19, 2012 8:42:48 pm PDT #18845 of 28333
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Well, he seemed to be somewhat generally enamored of the aesthetics of the 20s, no?
Indeed, but Gorey was pretty much a flaming queen in the pre-Stonewall era. A very brave and rather radical assertion of style for the time. Men were not wearing earrings in that era, or rings on all their fingers or attending the ballet five times a week. And he mixed it up with his sneakers and his more Edwardian beard.
There was a certain allowance for it - especially in a place like Manhattan. But it was a pretty bold stance to take for somebody who was still working primarily as a cover designer for publishers.
JZ - May 20, 2012 5:11:08 am PDT #18846 of 28333
See? I gave everybody here an opportunity to tell me what a bad person I am and nobody did, because I fuckin' rule.
Pshaw! Those ain't no silly pictures of serious authors! I've got your silly picture of serious authors right here:
My hand to God, this is 100% real. None more silly.
Consuela - May 20, 2012 7:20:27 am PDT #18847 of 28333
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
Word is Among Others has won the Nebula.
hippocampus - May 20, 2012 12:47:42 pm PDT #18848 of 28333
not your mom's socks.
It did it did it did! (that was a really strong list, IMHO)
hippocampus - May 21, 2012 7:47:57 am PDT #18849 of 28333
not your mom's socks.
I need the title of a book, from a description - how's your bookfinding-fu this morning, everyone?
What I know - the book is @ 20 years old (maybe), had a yellow cover, and the author's first name might have been Elizabeth. The setting was Medieval, the main character the oldest daughter of the king, who has since remarried. His new wife is pregnant and there are succession shenanigans afoot. There is an elaborate banquet scene with a large marzipan castle. And the title might have 'witch' in it.
I will bake cookies for the answer.
Strix - May 21, 2012 7:54:24 am PDT #18850 of 28333
A dress should be tight enough to show you're a woman but loose enough to flee from zombies. — Ginger
Is it a romance or straight historical fiction?
DavidS - May 21, 2012 8:12:24 am PDT #18851 of 28333
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Is it fantasy YA, Sox? Something like Eva Ibbotson might have written?