Damn you! My latest shot up to #5, but I fear its ability to hold.
Ooh, the Shadow one? I like that one.
River ,'Out Of Gas'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, flaming otters, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Damn you! My latest shot up to #5, but I fear its ability to hold.
Ooh, the Shadow one? I like that one.
My big floaty gas giant alien came from a Ben Bova book.
from the woman with the face transplant:
Ms. Dinoire described how she awoke to discover her horrible disfigurement after her black Labrador chewed off the lower part of her face while she was unconscious from taking sleeping pills in May last year in what many people contend was a suicide attempt.
"On May 27, after a very disturbing week and with lots of personal worries, I took drugs to forget," Ms. Dinoire said, adding that she passed out and fell against a piece of furniture.
"When I woke up, I tried to light a cigarette and didn't understand why it wouldn't stay between my lips," she said, her face slack and emotionless. "That's when I saw the pool of blood and the dog."
Alien, Predator and Corinna discuss cuddle parties: [link]
Was it the Shadow one?
Yeah, that's me.
Okay, that one made me do my loud donkey laugh.
Ms. Dinoire described how she awoke to discover her horrible disfigurement after her black Labrador chewed off the lower part of her face while she was unconscious from taking sleeping pills
Okay, does anyone think there's something we're not getting here? Besides the WTF of not noticing. I mean, dogs don't just go and do that.
The message recipients’ success rate at understanding the tone of the message was significantly higher verbally than via email.
This doesn't surprise me, but it doesn't say anything about the likelihood of misunderstanding an email -- just that it's more likely than misunderstanding a phone call. I'd be interested in reading the actual study, to see if they have any stats on what percentage of emails are misinterpreted because of tone.
There is a camel loose in Washington, DC: [link]
whistles innocently
I read that article twice, trying to figure out what was irritating. It's just seemed like a Reuters piece about a chick with a mildly interesting job. I don't think the tone suggested "She is the only person in the world with this job" or "This article is the definitive history of science illustration." What made it read that way to you?