I mean, let's say you did kill us. Or didn't. There could be torture. Whatever. But somehow you found the goods. What would your cut be?

Mal ,'Out Of Gas'


Natter 40: The Nice One  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Steph L. - Dec 07, 2005 11:07:04 am PST #9982 of 10006
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

The publisher who wanted a full on my book asked for a link to my LJ. I don't know what to do.

Go friendslock everything you wouldn't want reaching a wider audience. Double-check it. Have someone not on your friends list verify what entries they ARE able to see.

And then give the publisher the link.


§ ita § - Dec 07, 2005 11:07:04 am PST #9983 of 10006
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

beth, I'm good with that dream.

OTOH, the airport shooting is making my heart race.

msbelle, there's been a lot of ralphing going around. t insert standard ginger/dilute gatorade recommendation

Damn. Last week I IMed this co-worker about moving the mike of her headset closer to her mouth so she wouldn't have to yell. Already she has forgotten.

In non work news, I really want to fall down. Can't.


Laura - Dec 07, 2005 11:07:09 am PST #9984 of 10006
Our wings are not tired.

Oh dear Allyson. That's a bit of an outrageous request. Can you put up a phony one quickly with just stuff you want in there?

eta: or better yet Teppy's suggestion


Jesse - Dec 07, 2005 11:07:35 am PST #9985 of 10006
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Allyson, go through and make sure the right stuff is locked.

msbelle, get the ginger ale and take care of yourself.


§ ita § - Dec 07, 2005 11:07:54 am PST #9986 of 10006
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Why do they need your LJ link??? Would they want to look at your diary and e-mails to friends?


Connie Neil - Dec 07, 2005 11:07:59 am PST #9987 of 10006
brillig

Why would a publisher need your LJ? Unless it's geared exclusively to work stuff that he's interested in, that's an invasion of privacy.


Nicole - Dec 07, 2005 11:08:57 am PST #9988 of 10006
I'm getting the pig!

Teppy = smart!

But we all knew that.


Jesse - Dec 07, 2005 11:09:25 am PST #9989 of 10006
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I don't think it's an invasion of privacy, or all that weird. It's a blog, in reality, not private communication. She's writing about online fandom, I can see where someone would be interested in the real deal. The good news is that LJ lets you restrict access to whatever you want to whomever you want.


brenda m - Dec 07, 2005 11:09:36 am PST #9990 of 10006
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Kill the natter! Kill the natter!

Hire a hit man!

...

Oh crap.


§ ita § - Dec 07, 2005 11:11:23 am PST #9991 of 10006
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

It's a blog, in reality, not private communication.

It's a journal. That's weird. Unless she's in the process of blogging (which I consider publishing to an audience that may not be personally known to you), what's the relevance?

I'd tell her it's not a blog, and not relevant, and then show her something shiny in the opposite direction.