Any God who can, say, throw out the Dalai Lama and Gandhi is no God I'd care to worship.
I usually limit myself to Gandhi, but that's a line I've used, and I'm surprised when the argument lasts more than ten minutes.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Any God who can, say, throw out the Dalai Lama and Gandhi is no God I'd care to worship.
I usually limit myself to Gandhi, but that's a line I've used, and I'm surprised when the argument lasts more than ten minutes.
There's a passage where Jesus says, "No one comes to to Father but by me," which we were taught meant that you had to believe in Jesus to get to heaven.
Over the years I've been surprised to run into Christians who don't believe this - that you can get into heaven if you're not a Christian. That confused me, as I always saw that as one of the central tenets of Christianity. Now I'm wondering how widespread these various beliefs are. So, do most Christians believe that all non-Christians will go to hell?
There is the whole "I am the way, the truth, and the life" part too.
So, if you're following the way, the truth, or the life you're following the big J himself even if you don't realize it or intend to.
I have no idea the statictical break-down of Christians who believe what about the fates of the dirty heathens, however.
Somebody who is reasoning to faith from logic has to explain why it is logical that God allows cruelty.
What's illogical about a cruel God?
What's illogical about a cruel God?
Nothing, inherently, but you have to admit it conflicts with the picture many people like to paint.
So, do most Christians believe that all non-Christians will go to hell?
I have no idea, I've heard all sorts of things about what happens to non-Christians. The oddest thing to me is the idea that God already knows who the "real" Christians are and everybody else goes to hell, but that may be a pretty small group.
What's illogical about a cruel God?
Nothing, inherently, but you have to admit it conflicts with the picture many people like to paint.
I've always thought this was the "no such thing as a free lunch" idea, i.e. there has to be cruelty and pain and evil for people to overcome. If there's temptation, you have to resist it. If there's an opportunity to hurt someone, you don't take it. If there's pain, you have to get through it and come out on the other side still thanking God for your blessings, and not hating him.
Not my personal belief, by the way, but one that I think some believers use to explain the existence of cruelty and evil.
The oddest thing to me is the idea that God already knows who the "real" Christians are and everybody else goes to hell, but that may be a pretty small group.
See, I like this idea, as that means your fate is already determined, so there's really no use making any special effort to get into Heaven.
Ooh, God's omniscience vs. free will - that's another fun topic we can debate!
(Kidding. But I won't complain if others debate this.)
So, do most Christians believe that all non-Christians will go to hell?
That also makes me think where the cut off point is. Can you get in if you believe in a good sort of God-like god? Does belief in the God of Abraham get you in? Do more liberal denominations count? Do you have to vote Republican?
There's a passage where Jesus says, "No one comes to to Father but by me," which we were taught meant that you had to believe in Jesus to get to heaven.
Over the years I've been surprised to run into Christians who don't believe this - that you can get into heaven if you're not a Christian. That confused me, as I always saw that as one of the central tenets of Christianity.
I can tell you this much from the perspective of the Freak-Ass Church*, which is Protestant nondenominational, very evangelical, and very literal bible interpretation:
The simple answer is yes, they believe that non-Christians (i.e., those who do not accept Jesus as their savior) will go to hell. Just calling yourself a "Christian" and going to church every Sunday doesn't guarantee that you're a "Christian" by the accept-Jesus definition, and really, what ensures a seat in heaven is accepting Jesus, regardless of what you call yourself.
So, simple answer -- yes. Non-Christians will fry.
Less simple answer, which even the FAC recognized is a legitimate viewpoint: if you take the bible literally, it does say that no one comes to the Father (i.e., heaven) except through Jesus. It absolutely does.
However, here's the thing: the bible isn't real clear on what parameters make up the "through Jesus" part. It's pretty likely, however, that it isn't a narrowly defined thing, like you must say certain words, in front of a church full of people, and then get dunked in a holy pool, etc., etc., etc.
A controversial viewpoint is that maybe you don't even have to go "through Jesus" while you're alive. (I believe CS Lewis made that point, though it could have been Francis Schaeffer.) Because if there's *anything* we don't know, it's what happens after the monitor flatlines. Combine that uncertainty with the lack of specificity around "No one comes to the Father but through Jesus," and it's not at all outside the realm of possibility that "through Jesus" could occur after death. Or, at least, that post-death is one of the *options* to go "through Jesus."
I think the lack of specificity around "No one comes to the Father but through Jesus," was designed to have the exact opposite effect of the one it has now, in America, which is more or less a checklist of what you must do and say and how you must do it and say it in order to be a "Christian." I think "No one comes to the Father but through Jesus" very deliberately came without an instruction manual (or at least a long explicated paragraph explaining loopholes and exceptions), because there's more than one way for that to happen. There is probably an infinite number of ways, because God wants everyone. And if God wants everyone, and given that God made us all different and weird and almost incomprehensibly complex, then God is going to allow for -- and provide -- as many ways for us to come "through Jesus" as are needed to suit the crazy complex mess of humanity.
I could, however, be entirely full of shit, so please don't base your hope of eternal life on me.
*(I am speaking ONLY from *my* FAC's viewpoint, not the viewpoint of all Christians, all Protestants, all evangelicals, or even all FACs.)
Ooh, God's omniscience vs. free will - that's another fun topic we can debate!
I think the theory of gravity causes problems for the argument of free will.