Feh. I have to leave work now.
Yes. Yes you do.
Early ,'Objects In Space'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Feh. I have to leave work now.
Yes. Yes you do.
Aw, Hecubus. May I break with both our custom and {{Hec}}? Or would you prefer it if I just punch you in the arm or something? I've just trimmed my hair...
HAPPY BIRTHDAY CABILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!
In other news, I just finished a logical proof of the existence of God.
Huh. I highly doubt it it a valid proof.
Gershwin Girl (who, by the way, is totally enamored with that nickname
::pumps fist in triumph::
Yes. Yes you do.
I did. And my wife had a vodka tonic waiting for me that was bigger than a cowboy's brass spittoon.
Or would you prefer it if I just punch you in the arm
That'll do. Maybe a slap fight. No thumbwrestling, though!
I highly doubt it it a valid proof.
Hey, didn't we have this discussion a couple months ago? Was there math, D?
Hey, didn't we have this discussion a couple months ago?
I think so.
Huh. I highly doubt it it a valid proof.
Oh, it's valid, within its own context. It's the axioms I could probably poke holes in.
Oh, it's valid, within its own context. It's the axioms I could probably poke holes in.
::cancels plans for axiom submarine::
There was symbolic logic, which is math, sure. I'm still not 100% sure I followed it, and definitely can't give it. The book is "Minimalism: A Bridge between Classical Philosophy and the Bahá'í Revelation" by William S. Hatcher if you want to check it out. It's a really cool read, whether the God proof holds up or not.