Aw, Hecubus. May I break with both our custom and {{Hec}}? Or would you prefer it if I just punch you in the arm or something? I've just trimmed my hair...
Willow, check you out! Witch-Fu!
Buffy ,'Lessons'
Spike's Bitches 27: I'm Embarrassed for Our Kind.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
erikaj - Nov 06, 2005 5:30:12 pm PST #3098 of 10003
Always Anti-fascist!
Trudy Booth - Nov 06, 2005 5:30:56 pm PST #3099 of 10003
Greece's financial crisis threatens to take down all of Western civilization - a civilization they themselves founded. A rather tragic irony - which is something they also invented. - Jon Stewart
HAPPY BIRTHDAY CABILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!
tommyrot - Nov 06, 2005 6:04:21 pm PST #3100 of 10003
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
In other news, I just finished a logical proof of the existence of God.
Huh. I highly doubt it it a valid proof.
DavidS - Nov 06, 2005 6:10:13 pm PST #3101 of 10003
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Gershwin Girl (who, by the way, is totally enamored with that nickname
::pumps fist in triumph::
Yes. Yes you do.
I did. And my wife had a vodka tonic waiting for me that was bigger than a cowboy's brass spittoon.
Or would you prefer it if I just punch you in the arm
That'll do. Maybe a slap fight. No thumbwrestling, though!
Emily - Nov 06, 2005 6:14:10 pm PST #3102 of 10003
"In the equation E = mc⬧, c⬧ is a pretty big honking number." - Scola
I highly doubt it it a valid proof.
Hey, didn't we have this discussion a couple months ago? Was there math, D?
tommyrot - Nov 06, 2005 6:15:12 pm PST #3103 of 10003
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Hey, didn't we have this discussion a couple months ago?
I think so.
Gris - Nov 06, 2005 6:15:56 pm PST #3104 of 10003
Hey. New board.
Huh. I highly doubt it it a valid proof.
Oh, it's valid, within its own context. It's the axioms I could probably poke holes in.
tommyrot - Nov 06, 2005 6:19:07 pm PST #3105 of 10003
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Oh, it's valid, within its own context. It's the axioms I could probably poke holes in.
::cancels plans for axiom submarine::
Gris - Nov 06, 2005 6:21:38 pm PST #3106 of 10003
Hey. New board.
There was symbolic logic, which is math, sure. I'm still not 100% sure I followed it, and definitely can't give it. The book is "Minimalism: A Bridge between Classical Philosophy and the Bahá'í Revelation" by William S. Hatcher if you want to check it out. It's a really cool read, whether the God proof holds up or not.
tommyrot - Nov 06, 2005 6:22:19 pm PST #3107 of 10003
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
A question just popped into my head: Would the proof still be as valid if there were no human beings (or other intelligent life) anywhere in the universe? (Ignoring the fact that the proof was created by an intelligent human.)