I think I've just been scared straight WRT expired tags. Well, I note the use of "wanted to" and gather that they did not succeed, so, at least there's that. But, jeebus.
Natter 39 and Holding
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Not every state impounds cars with expired tags, Jen. California happens to be pretty militant on the subject. Your locale might be a bit different.
Happened to me in Georgia.
FTR, the cop who impounded my car? In addition to being a total bitch, she had expired tags.
Possibly I shouldn't have pointed that out.
Oops.
OK, so I totally want my own baby sea creature, a la Surface. Except it might eat my cats. So no. But it is so cute! And probably a cheaper electric source than BGE.
I think I am going to go pick up my car and then go browse around a book store. It's been a while since I've done that, and I can wait and do laundry tomorrow night.
Possibly I shouldn't have pointed that out.
I boggle at the gall of her impounding your car when her tags were expired. Boggle.
Good to know, Sean. Though maybe I'll just pretend otherwise so as not to get myself in trouble.
Glad you got your car back tonight, Perkins.
Look at that, a post all about cars. Huh.
Yes, there are Satanists, and a Satanic church, but that's actually about fun, kinky sex, and not murder. A real murderous Satanic cult doesn't ADVERTISE.
I will say that I've known at least one of the not-for-fun-kinky-sex murderous variety Satanists. And I don't think his interest in the occult was for show, as he was pursuing it years before murdering his girlfriend. But, not part of a wider cult so far as I'm aware.
I vote yes on bookstore wandering.
But, not part of a wider cult so far as I'm aware.
I think I'd also intended to state in my post that I'm perfectly willing to believe that there are crazy and/or fucked up, murderous people out there who are all about Satan, but that does not a cult make.
Is "murderous" some meaning you're putting on the term 'satanic' or was it described as such in the article? It's not in the part you quoted.