I think I am going to go pick up my car and then go browse around a book store. It's been a while since I've done that, and I can wait and do laundry tomorrow night.
Mal ,'Ariel'
Natter 39 and Holding
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Possibly I shouldn't have pointed that out.
I boggle at the gall of her impounding your car when her tags were expired. Boggle.
Good to know, Sean. Though maybe I'll just pretend otherwise so as not to get myself in trouble.
Glad you got your car back tonight, Perkins.
Look at that, a post all about cars. Huh.
Yes, there are Satanists, and a Satanic church, but that's actually about fun, kinky sex, and not murder. A real murderous Satanic cult doesn't ADVERTISE.
I will say that I've known at least one of the not-for-fun-kinky-sex murderous variety Satanists. And I don't think his interest in the occult was for show, as he was pursuing it years before murdering his girlfriend. But, not part of a wider cult so far as I'm aware.
I vote yes on bookstore wandering.
But, not part of a wider cult so far as I'm aware.
I think I'd also intended to state in my post that I'm perfectly willing to believe that there are crazy and/or fucked up, murderous people out there who are all about Satan, but that does not a cult make.
Is "murderous" some meaning you're putting on the term 'satanic' or was it described as such in the article? It's not in the part you quoted.
Hail Satan!
ahem.
Who wants to join my Satanic cult? No murder, though. In fact, all my Satanic cult will do is take the occasional holiday for Black Mass....
Hail Satan!
That's, like, my favorite song ever.
Is "murderous" some meaning you're putting on the term 'satanic' or was it described as such in the article?
No. The article wasn't even about Satanic cults, and the figure I quoted was only used tangentially at best. In fact, part of my irritation with the idiotic figure is that it's thrown in despite the fact that, as far as I can tell, it has no relation to the rest of the article. Which was about the Vatican defending the practice of exorcism.
What prompted your question?
What prompted your question?
Could it be... Satan?
(sorry - am very tired.)