Re the teaser: I'm not convinced it is Duncan's, nor that Meg believes it is. She knows that if Veronica believes that, she's more likely to help Meg keep the baby. Also, who wants to bet Veronica ends up on Logan's jury?

Wolfram: I don't think that would be allowed. She's too connected.

Yeah, she would be disqualified instantaneously during the jury review process.

Should the thread slug be edited to reinforce the web promos not being okay for open discussion here?

I don't think we've ever discussed web promos as being too spoilery for this thread at least in whitefont. Is spoiler lite the appropriate place for them?

Whitefont isn't open discussion, in my books.

However, someone might read "aired" and think that web things the network has released are as blackfontable as what was on TV.

If you figure no one will read it and make that mistake, so you don't need the slug edited, no worries.

Actually I agree with you. Maybe you should edit the slug to read "Anything that's aired in the US (including television promos) is fair game..."

We can hash out the approach to web promos, which seems to be a weekly occurrence, in thread.

Is there a problem with the current handling?

I think the concern is that someone reading the slug and not knowing that web promos may be considered spoilery may blackfont that information. Since no determination has been reached in thread about their status, it may be prudent to specify promos in the slug as limited to television promos and not other types of promos, like the upn.com online teasers.

Do we consider the upn.com promos spoilery? My personal preference is to have the discussion whitefonted here. If anyone objects it's no biggee to move it to Lite.

My definition of spoilery is information not put out there officially by the network. YSDMV