MG, because you were signed into my computer this weekend, there's a chance that that got changed from Yes to No somehow. That happened to someone else who used my computer a while back.
You're wrong about River. River's not on the ship. They didn't want her here, but she couldn't make herself leave. So she melted... Melted away. They didn't know she could do that, but she did.
River ,'Objects In Space'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Lee - Jan 03, 2006 3:42:21 pm PST #831 of 4673
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
SuziQ - Jan 03, 2006 4:05:17 pm PST #832 of 4673
Back tattoos of the mother is that you are absolutely right - Ame
Perkins - bing, bing, bing. I didn't even check that cause I'm a dork.
*backs sheepishly out of the thread*
tommyrot - Jan 12, 2006 8:54:54 am PST #833 of 4673
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
How hard would it be to change the html title of the message center, to add the number of unread posts at the end?
For example, currenty the title of Bloglines is
Bloglines | My Feeds (12)
telling me at a glance to Firefox tab for that page that I have 12 unread blog posts on Bloglines.
Not a big deal, but it'd be nice to have if this was an easy thing to do.
§ ita § - Jan 12, 2006 9:05:13 am PST #834 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
At the time the header is generated, the code doesn't know how many posts are unread. In fact, the page never knows--the thread titles (with unread counts) are returned to it as text from another function.
So there'd be more tweaking than might first seem required.
tommyrot - Jan 12, 2006 9:09:24 am PST #835 of 4673
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Yeah, I was afraid of that.
§ ita § - Jan 12, 2006 9:11:42 am PST #836 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Architecturally, there's more integrity in assembling the HTML in just one place--it's kinda cheating to put it together in three, like it currently works.
A streamlining job, while nowhere near imminent, is probably a good idea.
Tom Scola - Jan 15, 2006 2:37:48 am PST #837 of 4673
Mr. Scola’s wardrobe by Botany 500
Weren't we able to put <table>s inside posts at some point?
DXMachina - Jan 15, 2006 3:12:10 am PST #838 of 4673
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
We still are, AFAIK.
Let's see...
Temp Yesterday:60° Temp Today:30°
eta:Yup.
Lee - Jan 15, 2006 5:13:24 am PST #839 of 4673
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
This probably has something to do with the tables, but in Safari, Tom Scola's post Tom Scola "Buffista Music III: The Search for Bach" Jan 15, 2006 4:30:11 am PST
appears above later posts and above the "Read New Message Center First [etc] links. It is also left justified. eta: I took a screen shot of it I could send someone, if this isn't clear.
eta: unless you are viewing it by itself with no other posts on the page. If you do that, it is normal.
Tom Scola - Jan 15, 2006 5:33:08 am PST #840 of 4673
Mr. Scola’s wardrobe by Botany 500
I deleted my post because I thought that my table was screwing up the page. It looks like someone else's post is the problem.