It looks to me as though it does link to the same address you linked above in this thread. What was the end result of the edit that you wanted?
I may be love's bitch, but at least I'm man enough to admit it.
Spike ,'Sleeper'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Liese S. - Nov 12, 2005 2:45:09 pm PST #744 of 4671
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."
DXMachina - Nov 12, 2005 2:49:52 pm PST #745 of 4671
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Got it. And got Fic, too, while I was at it.
Oops. I only looked in the TV folder for NAFDA threads.
Gus - Nov 12, 2005 2:55:28 pm PST #746 of 4671
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.
Liese:"Bork" withdrawn.
§ ita § - Nov 14, 2005 8:31:08 am PST #747 of 4671
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The link editing functionality should be working for link owners now. Please holler if it's not.
Allyson - Nov 14, 2005 12:28:23 pm PST #748 of 4671
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
damn it. everytime I click on a NAFDA thread I get the NAFDA FAQ.
Can we add, "get Allyson a personal secretary to check threads throughout the day and email posts of interest" to the list?
§ ita § - Nov 14, 2005 12:36:20 pm PST #749 of 4671
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I was going to mention that (not the secretary thing, you're on your own with the wetware) -- I've almost clicked on the NAFDA myself a few times. Maybe the link is better at the end of the slug, or only in the thread description.
DXMachina - Nov 14, 2005 12:52:22 pm PST #750 of 4671
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Huh. I usually click right in the middle of the thread link, so it's never an issue.
§ ita § - Nov 17, 2005 1:07:18 pm PST #751 of 4671
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Right now, the search algorithm works by relevance, which is a cloudy concept. I want to add in the ability to flip the order (ascending/descending) or to order by date.
I'm thinking that date order is a good default, but confusing to people used to relevance.
However -- ascending or descending?
aurelia - Nov 17, 2005 2:05:06 pm PST #752 of 4671
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.
descending
Gris - Nov 17, 2005 2:07:19 pm PST #753 of 4671
Hey. New board.
Every time I use the search feature, I'm personally quite surprised that it doesn't sort by date. That's how I'd like it to work - most recent first.