Well, DX, your request is in the pipeline.
Early: So is it still her room when it's empty? Does the room, the thing, have purpose? Or do we -- what's the word? Simon: I really can't help you. Early: The plan is to take your sister. Get the reward, which is substantial. 'Imbue.' That's the word.
'Objects In Space'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
§ ita § - Jul 26, 2005 11:49:41 am PDT #47 of 4671
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
DXMachina - Jul 26, 2005 11:56:54 am PDT #48 of 4671
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
I understand that, and will patiently await further developments.
Eddie - Jul 26, 2005 9:05:13 pm PDT #49 of 4671
Your tag here.
RQG:
Cacophony. That's pretty. What's it mean?"
Harmony, 'Disharmony'
It shouldn't have the double quote at the end to be consistent with the formatting style of the other quotes.
Allyson - Jul 28, 2005 4:12:14 pm PDT #50 of 4671
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica
Is there a mod around?
DXMachina - Jul 28, 2005 4:30:00 pm PDT #51 of 4671
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Done and done.
DXMachina - Jul 28, 2005 4:31:39 pm PDT #52 of 4671
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
ita, the bot is back. There's more clean up to be done on the user list. This is getting tiresome.
tommyrot - Jul 28, 2005 4:36:42 pm PDT #53 of 4671
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Can you block its IP address?
(Nah, it's pro'lly not that simple, huh?)
DXMachina - Jul 28, 2005 5:14:17 pm PDT #54 of 4671
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
What's happening is someone with an aol address (I think) is trying to register groups of five random letter user names using e-mail addresses of randomletters@buffistas.org. Since the e-mail addresses don't exist, the registration fails when the system tries to send the confirmation message. Also, their script isn't very good, because one of the attempted user names always looks like this:
xhsskxuw@buffistas.orgnContent-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0031847247=="nMIME-Version: 1.0nSubject: 2a1cdc5enTo: xhsskxuw@buffistas.orgnbcc: jrubin3546@aol.comnFrom: xhsskxuw@buffistas.orgnnThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.nn--===============0031847247==nContent-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"nMIME-Version: 1.0nContent-Transfer-Encoding: 7bitnnlbzhztn--===============0031847247==--n
The bcc is why I think it's coming from an aol account, but the IP has changed with each batch.
DCJensen - Jul 28, 2005 5:29:23 pm PDT #55 of 4671
All is well that ends in pizza.
Could the AOL part be spoofed?
DXMachina - Jul 28, 2005 5:34:03 pm PDT #56 of 4671
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.
Possibly, but given that we only see it by accident, I doubt it. More likely they're just opening new aol accounts.