Not to me. But I'm less focused on that phrase.
And we live to fight another day.
Mal ,'Objects In Space'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Jesse - Aug 20, 2005 6:59:23 am PDT #290 of 4671
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Jessica - Aug 20, 2005 7:00:26 am PDT #291 of 4671
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?
I liked it with just "Film and TV." "Discussion Areas Subfolders" looks wrong.
Jesse - Aug 20, 2005 7:02:56 am PDT #292 of 4671
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I like the clarity that what's in the subfolders is still a discussion area, and not something else. I realize that calling it a "sub" folder implies that what I'm looking at is the main folder, and clearly that contains discussion areas, but I'll stop typing now.
Kat - Aug 20, 2005 7:03:03 am PDT #293 of 4671
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
I'm indifferent to nomenclature. But I like the closed threads nesting within the topical folder.
Thanks ita!
Topic!Cindy - Aug 20, 2005 7:05:55 am PDT #294 of 4671
What is even happening?
I'm not seeing
Discussion Areas Subfolders
On the main page (b.org) I'm seeing the "Subfolders" Red bar, with "Film and TV Discussion" (which I think looks much better than just "Film/TV"), and "Closed Threads" under it.
Then I'm seeing another red bar, with "Discussion Threads" in it.
When I click on the "Film and TV Discussion" link, it takes me to www.buffistas.org/index.php?folder_id=5.
There I see a red bar with "Film and TV Discussion Subfolders". Under it, I see links for "Closed Film and TV Threads".
Then there's another red bar, with "Film and TV Discussion". Under it are all the active Film and TV threads.
I like it better.
§ ita § - Aug 20, 2005 7:07:24 am PDT #295 of 4671
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
It was extant when you last posted, Cindy, but I didn't want to leave it up just to make a point, so I switched the folder name back to something that left the pages making sense.
Jessica - Aug 20, 2005 7:08:27 am PDT #296 of 4671
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?
To me, the word "Discussion" seems redundant. I mean, discussion is all we do here. What else could it possibly be?
But as I'm a Message Center gal, I should probably not care so much.
§ ita § - Aug 20, 2005 7:09:48 am PDT #297 of 4671
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I mean, discussion is all we do here. What else could it possibly be?
A summary of posts made by Tim or Joss. A breakdown of promos. A request for tapes. A personal announcement ...
I'd close the pedant tag, but who'd I be fooling?
Topic!Cindy - Aug 20, 2005 7:13:31 am PDT #298 of 4671
What is even happening?
It was extant when you last posted, Cindy, but I didn't want to leave it up just to make a point, so I switched the folder name back to something that left the pages making sense.
Well, then, I like both. I think I prefer how it is, now (that is, with what I copied into the post above).
I don't think it would bug if you put "Areas" back, although I'd use "Area" or "Threads" rather than "Areas". I'm not sure why, though. At any rate, I like having the word "discussion" added.
Jessica - Aug 20, 2005 7:15:48 am PDT #299 of 4671
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?
A summary of posts made by Tim or Joss. A breakdown of promos. A request for tapes. A personal announcement ...
Fine, fine.
(But all of those are already sectioned off into the yellow sidebar. Center things are all discussions!)