Flames wouldn't be eternal if they actually consumed anything.

Lilah ,'Not Fade Away'


Buffistas Building a Better Board ++

Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.


Jessica - Aug 20, 2005 7:00:26 am PDT #291 of 4671
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?

I liked it with just "Film and TV." "Discussion Areas Subfolders" looks wrong.


Jesse - Aug 20, 2005 7:02:56 am PDT #292 of 4671
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I like the clarity that what's in the subfolders is still a discussion area, and not something else. I realize that calling it a "sub" folder implies that what I'm looking at is the main folder, and clearly that contains discussion areas, but I'll stop typing now.


Kat - Aug 20, 2005 7:03:03 am PDT #293 of 4671
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

I'm indifferent to nomenclature. But I like the closed threads nesting within the topical folder.

Thanks ita!


Topic!Cindy - Aug 20, 2005 7:05:55 am PDT #294 of 4671
What is even happening?

I'm not seeing

Discussion Areas Subfolders

On the main page (b.org) I'm seeing the "Subfolders" Red bar, with "Film and TV Discussion" (which I think looks much better than just "Film/TV"), and "Closed Threads" under it.

Then I'm seeing another red bar, with "Discussion Threads" in it.

When I click on the "Film and TV Discussion" link, it takes me to www.buffistas.org/index.php?folder_id=5.

There I see a red bar with "Film and TV Discussion Subfolders". Under it, I see links for "Closed Film and TV Threads".

Then there's another red bar, with "Film and TV Discussion". Under it are all the active Film and TV threads.

I like it better.


§ ita § - Aug 20, 2005 7:07:24 am PDT #295 of 4671
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

It was extant when you last posted, Cindy, but I didn't want to leave it up just to make a point, so I switched the folder name back to something that left the pages making sense.


Jessica - Aug 20, 2005 7:08:27 am PDT #296 of 4671
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?

To me, the word "Discussion" seems redundant. I mean, discussion is all we do here. What else could it possibly be?

But as I'm a Message Center gal, I should probably not care so much.


§ ita § - Aug 20, 2005 7:09:48 am PDT #297 of 4671
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I mean, discussion is all we do here. What else could it possibly be?

A summary of posts made by Tim or Joss. A breakdown of promos. A request for tapes. A personal announcement ...

I'd close the pedant tag, but who'd I be fooling?


Topic!Cindy - Aug 20, 2005 7:13:31 am PDT #298 of 4671
What is even happening?

It was extant when you last posted, Cindy, but I didn't want to leave it up just to make a point, so I switched the folder name back to something that left the pages making sense.

Well, then, I like both. I think I prefer how it is, now (that is, with what I copied into the post above).

I don't think it would bug if you put "Areas" back, although I'd use "Area" or "Threads" rather than "Areas". I'm not sure why, though. At any rate, I like having the word "discussion" added.


Jessica - Aug 20, 2005 7:15:48 am PDT #299 of 4671
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?

A summary of posts made by Tim or Joss. A breakdown of promos. A request for tapes. A personal announcement ...

Fine, fine.

(But all of those are already sectioned off into the yellow sidebar. Center things are all discussions!)


Liese S. - Aug 20, 2005 7:59:44 am PDT #300 of 4671
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

We're funny. Long live our pedantry.

If this is contradictory to an earlier opinion of mine, please feel free to choose which one to disregard.

Liese, may I please tag this?

Tag away!