Weird. I unmarked that old Tom post and Hil's post unmarked itself, too.
Sidenote: are bookmarks supposed to be listed chronologically, because mine are all jumbled?
Mal ,'Serenity'
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
Weird. I unmarked that old Tom post and Hil's post unmarked itself, too.
Sidenote: are bookmarks supposed to be listed chronologically, because mine are all jumbled?
They should be ordered by the date you bookmarked them, Sail. Is that not happening for you?
Also--if you re-mark Tom's post, does Hil's come up marked again?
It doesn't look like it, ita. I thought I saw a couple of 2009 posts cheek by jowl with 2006 and 2007 and other older posts. Could just be my eyes playing tricks on me.
I went back and re-marked Tom's post and it also marked Hil's, again.
Sail, check Hil R. "Spike's Bitches 44: It's about the rules having changed." Apr 28, 2009 3:34:32 pm PDT again now.
Aha! It is now unmarked. Very good.
Sail, it looks like the date bookmarked field got overwritten in the conversion--sorry about that.
I don't think I would have even noticed it if it hadn't been the very first post on the page at the time. I tend to pay more attention to them.
There's some whitefont spillover in Movies, starting in this post: Strega "Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai" May 22, 2009 11:52:43 pm PDT
Question: For those of us amongst you posters that don't use short tags why not? Is the result unpredictable? Inflexible? Confusing explanation? How can we clear things up?
I like and use the short tags, but sometimes I want multiple effects, e.g. spoilers or italics within a block quote.