Why can't Opera do something like that? Though I have started poking into their development stuff and it's quite interesting.
eta: I take that back. I just have to get the hang of Dragonfly.
Maybe I've always been here.
Early ,'Objects In Space'
Buffistas Building a Better Board ++
Do you have problems, concerns, or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.
§ ita § - Apr 11, 2009 1:58:59 pm PDT #2817 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Ailleann - Apr 13, 2009 5:56:19 am PDT #2818 of 4673
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda
Okay, I'm possibly the slowest kid on the block, but did I really never know until now that when you threadsuck, it exposes whitefont? Is there a way to, you know, not do that?
§ ita § - Apr 13, 2009 6:02:08 am PDT #2819 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
There is a way not to do that, but we need to work out what we're breaking for other people first.
Also, a reminder, Bugtracker in the thread header is for feature requests. If you're serious about it, please put it there, because otherwise I end up with a soup of confusing bookmarks from this thread, and other people can't see what's been requested/reported.
Jessica - Apr 13, 2009 6:40:15 am PDT #2820 of 4673
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
There is a way not to do that, but we need to work out what we're breaking for other people first.
...anyone else think Amazon should hire ita?
Ailleann - Apr 13, 2009 8:54:53 am PDT #2821 of 4673
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda
I will make a suggestion in the Bugtracker! I just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing something obvious first...
Jesse - Apr 13, 2009 11:40:06 am PDT #2822 of 4673
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I am sometimes suprised (and spoiled) by accidentally reading the whitefont in a threadsuck, but generally I only suck Natter, and the level of spoilage is pretty low in there, even in whitefont.
Ailleann - Apr 13, 2009 11:45:46 am PDT #2823 of 4673
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda
I bring it up because I got spoiled for FNL in an oblique way (and a long-term one, as I am not currently caught up on the show, but plan to watch on DVD) in Natter. It took me reading several posts to even realize what people were talking about was originally whitefonted.
(See above re: sometimes I'm kind of slow.)
Connie Neil - Apr 13, 2009 11:49:54 am PDT #2824 of 4673
brillig
Only threadsuck stuff when I'm looking for a specific post, so I grab the thread then use Find to find the relevant phrase.
§ ita § - Apr 13, 2009 11:52:17 am PDT #2825 of 4673
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
If there are people who want it the way it is, things become more complicated.
I'm going to leave the question open for a bit, since threadsuckers aren't necessarily around a lot.
JenP - Apr 13, 2009 11:56:17 am PDT #2826 of 4673
I have been spoiled before, but I've gotten progressively less spoiler averse since joining the board... and, frankly, the aging that's happened since then, because I forget shit all the damn time anyway.
So, I would not object if we changed it so that white font actually stayed whitefont (or didn't change it). But it would definitely still work for me if you did change it so that white font stayed white font.
I don't thread suck often enough to really have a horse in the race, though.