People do occasionally use font tags to change color of a limited amount of text for effect, but it's rare.

I'm a reformed font tagger, but I'm sure I slip sometimes. Old html habits die hard. I still type <i> instead of quick editing for that type of formatting. Prolly ought to change that habit, too, huh? Are people using their css to deal with emphasis formatting?

I'm still using the font color=white HTML because the CSS stuff is way beyond me. Is there something else I should be doing? Or can someone tell me what exact code to put on my CSS style sheet to make my whitefont conform, or whatever?

If you use the quick edit for spoiler fonts--an 's' before the line you want to white font--it shouldn't mess with people's style sheets.

Right?

Oh! DUH. Thank you, Sue.

Or can someone tell me what exact code to put on my CSS style sheet to make my whitefont conform, or whatever?

What you put in your CSS style sheet affects only what you see, not what anyone else sees.

For spoilers, using the "s" quickedit is best, but second best is using the tag <span class="spoiler">stuffyouwantblinvisible</span>

I use html for everything because I've never been able to do the quickedit thing successfully. I get weird line breaks and inevitably the italics or spoilerfont gets frelled, I edit a kabillion times and generally feel like a failure.

How dire is it that I do the (s)text(/s) stuff instead of quickedit?

You may be spoiling people who don't want to be spoiled and making extra work for those that do want the spoilers.

How dire is it that I do the (s)text(/s) stuff instead of quickedit?

using the spoiler class as I posted above is exactly the same as using the s quickedit, except it takes a lot longer to type.

What you put in your CSS style sheet affects only what you see, not what anyone else sees.

Just proves how little I know about CSS!

I'll use the s quickedit. Thanks, all.

Oh, that's what the question meant! Misread on my part. Sorry.