Gwen: Demon, OK? The whole nine—cloven feet and horns and teeth. He wasn't wearing lamé though. Lorne: Yeah, the evil ones can't pull it off. It gets camp.

'Harm's Way'


Natter 37: Oddly Enough, We've Had This Conversation Before.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Daisy Jane - Aug 12, 2005 11:23:47 am PDT #7795 of 10002
"This bar smells like kerosene and stripper tears."

Heather, I have two words for you: Deep Pockets. It's a long standing legal tradition.

I understand that, I just don't understand how they can expect to win against the show and more specifically the builder. If ABC promised me a "Dream Wedding" and they gave me swans and pretty dresses and coq au vin on gilded plates, but then Mr. H ran off with a bridesmaid, they've pretty much fulfilled their obligation and it's Mr. H and that bitch bridesmaid I should be suing.


Frankenbuddha - Aug 12, 2005 11:25:54 am PDT #7796 of 10002
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"

She's a cautionary tale.

Like Joey Heatherton.


tommyrot - Aug 12, 2005 11:26:53 am PDT #7797 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I experience love at first site a lot in my dreams. Never in real life, though.


Kathy A - Aug 12, 2005 11:27:13 am PDT #7798 of 10002
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

Lola Falana!

Sorry, I seem to be in a mid-1970s-starlet fugue here.


Steph L. - Aug 12, 2005 11:27:16 am PDT #7799 of 10002
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Wait, we want to find them, right?

The rich ones, you betcha.

She's a cautionary tale.

If I can't be a good example, I'll just have to be a cautionary tale.


P.M. Marc - Aug 12, 2005 11:27:24 am PDT #7800 of 10002
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Plei, here's the dress

Cute!


Gudanov - Aug 12, 2005 11:29:47 am PDT #7801 of 10002
Coding and Sleeping

Bush refuses to rule out force against Iran

[link]

Sounds like the Iran rhetoric is heating up.


Jessica - Aug 12, 2005 11:30:06 am PDT #7802 of 10002
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

My gut feeling is that I dislike severing physical attraction from the romantic love equation. I think it's Paul-ist or something - distrusting the body.

But what I'm trying to do is sever romantic love from the physical attraction equation. It's a whole different vibe.


Topic!Cindy - Aug 12, 2005 11:30:27 am PDT #7803 of 10002
What is even happening?

My gut feeling is that I dislike severing physical attraction from the romantic love equation.
That's funny, only because I think of you as much sexually freer (in attitude) than I am or than I would want to be. I think sex works better in concert with love.

I think it's Paul-ist or something - distrusting the body.
How is that Paulist? I'm not getting the reference.

I think it is as valid a definition of love as any other we have.
Really?

I don't much like the exalted love ideal as promulgated by Medieval troubadours which has dribbled on down to our century. I think a lot of western culture's notions about love are kind of pathological. Particularly in USian culture.
Me too, but I'm confused a little by what you're saying, because it seems to me you're saying the opposite above, when you're saying it's as valid a definition of love as any other we have. I think a lot of people mistake sexual attraction and desire for love, even when love doesn't come. To me, the ideal love for a couple (I want to use the word 'romantic' to modify it, but I don't want the baggage, but you know what I mean, yes?) has the sexual component, but also includes the kinds of devotion one has toward a close friend, family members. I don't know that I wouldn't say the types aren't dependent on each other. I don't think there can be a neat separation, because they enhance each other, and when one component is missing, the other levels on which partners relate seems (to me) to suffer.

There's also some suspcion that the ideas of romantic love that don't factor in sexual attraction are either acts of bad faith or rationalizations.

What did you mean, above? I'm not following. I don't think I understand what a romantic love could be if/when sexual attraction isn't factored in.

In sum: I suspect that romantic love may be a subset of sex with a lot of higher cortical function dancing around madly trying to distract us from this unflattering truth.

I don't know. I think it can be, but I don't think I would call that love. I would still call it desire. I love Scott in all the ways you love someone, and my desire for him is strong. If an illness was going to remove one aspect from our relationship though, it would be easier, although very sad and a trial, to lose the sexual aspect than it would be to lose his...I don't know what to call it...his companionship. He's my best friend and most trusted ally. He's my confidant. If our relationship were to end, it would be hard work surviving it, because he would be the one I'd want to run to--to pour my heart out about it.


beth b - Aug 12, 2005 11:31:11 am PDT #7804 of 10002
oh joy! Oh Rapture ! I have a brain!

Because even in my unloving state there are guys whose groins I might want to be around, but don't particularly care for their insides, even as initially presented. The guys who you know might get into your pants, but are not getting your number.

exactly.

It isn't that desire /lust is seperate from love, but they are different. And I also believe that desire/lust can last. Unfortunatley it is an emotion that can be influenced by someone forgetting to take out the garbage ( let alone more serious issues) .