For anyone who's ever wondered why there needed to be so many different kinds. (And I know we've had that conversation here.)
Natter 37: Oddly Enough, We've Had This Conversation Before.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Thank you for that.
Coke with lime: easy to understand soda concept that has omnipresent explanatory advertising. You put lime in it? FUCKING WAY!
C2, Coke zero, diet coke, dc with splenda: confusing coke technology! No cutesy Nilsson covers!
Wait -- Coke Zero has calories?
Wait -- Coke Zero has calories?Do they round down?
Do they round down?
Maybe it's that craxxy banker rounding.
craxxy banker roundingOddly enough, we've had this conversation before.
ita: [link]
Speaking of covers (we were, weren't we?), they just played a cover of Bohemian Rhapsody on the radio. The DJ still hasn't revealed who the artist was, but I think it was a waste of time.
Bohemian Rhapsody isn't about sex, is it?
Hmm. Now I know who, but can we ever know why?
Huh.
DJ finally talked. It was the Flaming Lips. I usually like them. But their version was too close to the sound of the original, but not as good.
He also played a clip of Joss Stone doing Under Pressure. I wouldn't say it was better (than the original), but not worse either. Definitely different.