Wait. People? She eats people? 'To Serve Man.' It's 'To Serve Man' all over again.

Gunn ,'Power Play'


Natter 37: Oddly Enough, We've Had This Conversation Before.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Lee - Jul 23, 2005 5:08:42 pm PDT #2421 of 10002
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

It doesn't sound very appealing. I think I shall stick to Chocolate Therapy and Magic Brownie.

We approve of capris, right? I bought a pair at Target, my very first.

OOH, I also bought a dress to wear to dinner next saturday when we go to Dukes.


Jesse - Jul 23, 2005 5:50:01 pm PDT #2422 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Thinking back, I think the wasabi dessert thing I had included wasabi foam, so not too wasabi-ish. It seems a shame to ruin perfectly good ginger ice cream.

I heart capris.


msbelle - Jul 23, 2005 5:54:56 pm PDT #2423 of 10002
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

dom dom
domdomdom
domdomdomdom

DOG SHOW!

I need to be going to bed, but I am still hot and not actually tired.

last day of the Tour de France tomorrow.


Steph L. - Jul 23, 2005 6:01:21 pm PDT #2424 of 10002
I look more rad than Lutheranism

last day of the Tour de France tomorrow.

My best friend is THERE. And by "THERE," I mean she's in Paris, staying in the SAME hotel that Lance, et al., are staying in. She's going to be on the freaking Champs Elysee tomorrow when the cyclists come riding in.

Bitch.


beth b - Jul 23, 2005 6:46:46 pm PDT #2425 of 10002
oh joy! Oh Rapture ! I have a brain!

Went to cold stone ( not the gelotto place which I like better) . Tried the wasabi icecream. It wasn't bad, but it wasn't good either. Interesting was the best I could come up with.

But no one told me they had black licorice ice cream. That was amazing. and no one else really wants it but me...Unfortunatley I want a lot.


erikaj - Jul 23, 2005 6:51:46 pm PDT #2426 of 10002
Always Anti-fascist!

Yummy. Not just you. Is it black?


P.M. Marc - Jul 23, 2005 6:54:22 pm PDT #2427 of 10002
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

But no one told me they had black licorice ice cream. That was amazing. and no one else really wants it but me...Unfortunatley I want a lot.

Me! Me!


beth b - Jul 23, 2005 7:01:19 pm PDT #2428 of 10002
oh joy! Oh Rapture ! I have a brain!

Yummy. Not just you. Is it black?

actually grey. and unattractive. which makes peopl even less curious to taste it.

I should have known Plei and erika would want some . people with good taste.

I am thinking I need to figure out how to make ice cream with sambuca


quester - Jul 23, 2005 7:05:41 pm PDT #2429 of 10002
Danger is my middle name, only I spell it R. u. t. h. - Tina Belcher.

actually grey. and unattractive.

I'd just close my eyes and just let the taste do the talkin!


tommyrot - Jul 23, 2005 7:07:23 pm PDT #2430 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Argh. I was getting ready for bed, but now I am far too angry to go to sleep. I AM SO FUCKING SICK OF THIS BULLSHIT!!!

From Slashdot:

"The Washington Post reports that House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton (R-Tx) has requested raw data and personal financial information on three scientists who published a paper which claimed that temperatures rose precipitously in the 20th century. Colleagues (including other Republicans) are calling the investigation 'misguided and illegitimate.' Barton has long been an opponent of government action on global warming."

From the Washington Post:

Many scientists and some of Mr. Barton's Republican colleagues say they were stunned by the manner in which the committee, whose chairman rejects the existence of climate change, demanded personal and private information last month from researchers whose work supports a contrary conclusion. The scientists, co-authors of an influential 1999 study showing a dramatic increase in global warming over the past millennium, were told to hand over not only raw data but personal financial information, information on grants received and distributed, and computer codes.

How long will conservatives be allowed to harass scientists who publish data that disagrees with Republican ideology?

God, I don't know what else to say. Except that for the past five years there's been a long series of attempts by conservatives to silence scientific results they don't like....

OK, the fact that some Republicans are shocked by this is a good sign.

Crap. Sorry.