and it just didn't work out.
It didn't work out because Amber said, "No." She thought she'd be betraying the fans by having Tara come back as only a front for the First Evil.
Well, my days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle.
Mal ,'Our Mrs. Reynolds'
The Minearverse 4: Support Group for Clumsy People
[NAFDA] "There will be an occasional happy, so that it might be crushed under the boot of the writer." From Zorro to Angel (including Wonderfalls and The Inside), this is where Buffistas come to anoint themselves in the bloodbath.
DavidS - Sep 23, 2005 1:53:08 pm PDT #4179 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
§ ita § - Sep 23, 2005 1:55:15 pm PDT #4180 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I don't see where you're going with citing the sole thing, or Joss's casting intentions. What do they have to do with him giving more detail on the show bible?
Kiba Rika - Sep 23, 2005 2:19:25 pm PDT #4181 of 10001
I may have to seize the cat.
It will be revealed that Ida Moon did not actually rip the pony's face off. No, the pony ripped off its own face because its attempts to understand Ida drove it to madness.
It just didn't realize that all Ida's rage came from the fact that no one could pronounce her name correctly.
Topic!Cindy - Sep 23, 2005 2:21:25 pm PDT #4182 of 10001
What is even happening?
I don't see where you're going with citing the sole thing, or Joss's casting intentions. What do they have to do with him giving more detail on the show bible?I don't think there is a show bible. Joss says what he means at the time, but he also doesn't lock himself in. He's actually mentioned not giving too much back story in the shows, so that he's not written into a corner.
Kiba Rika - Sep 23, 2005 2:27:47 pm PDT #4183 of 10001
I may have to seize the cat.
He's not above rewriting backstory if it doesn't suit his goal at the moment.
§ ita § - Sep 23, 2005 2:33:39 pm PDT #4184 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I don't think there is a show bible.
Okay, canon. Not show bible. Joss explaining what was canon at the moment. What does that have to do with his casting intentions? And I have no idea what the sole thing is supposed to mean. They seem to be three concepts, related mostly by the word Joss.
Katie M - Sep 23, 2005 2:38:09 pm PDT #4185 of 10001
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies
I interpreted that post as meaning "Joss makes shit up for fun and should not necessarily be believed."
§ ita § - Sep 23, 2005 2:42:54 pm PDT #4186 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I interpreted that post as meaning "Joss makes shit up for fun and should not necessarily be believed."
I would have too, except it's not news, and I'm not sure what it has to do with anything. But I'm talking in circles. So I'm gonna stop.
Topic!Cindy - Sep 23, 2005 2:50:09 pm PDT #4187 of 10001
What is even happening?
I would have too, except it's not news, and I'm not sure what it has to do with anything. But I'm talking in circles. So I'm gonna stop.Mentioning the sole was just a Joss says all sorts of things kind of comment, ita. I'm sorry it was so confusing. What Joss mostly says is, "Trust the tale, not the teller," and that's something he said at the Bronze, I think, so maybe it isn't fandom wide. What it meant to me is, believe was, "Believe what my shows say onscreen, not what I might say in random interviews."
§ ita § - Sep 23, 2005 2:53:10 pm PDT #4188 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
"Believe what my shows say onscreen, not what I might say in random interviews."
But ... but ... I do believe what he showed onscreen. I'm just pointing out that your search for disbelieving what's said onscreen is also contradicted by what he said offscreen. Hopefully that's straight line enough.