It IS fun, especially the patient yet deeply tortured expression on the pup's face as she suffers the whole process, including pleading looks over her shoulder as, horrors!, the warm water is poured over her.
Natter 36: But We Digress...
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Slashdot's take on the Spam-a-lot Tony wins:
Monty Python's SPAMalot Wins 5, no, 3 Tony Awards
I think, -t, (among other things, I think that I can't start a line with your name) that your calculations leave out the fact that it starts from 100 rather than from 0, so to both your triangles need to be added little rectangles, like so:
0.5(0.5(500)) {triangle} + 0.5(100) {teensy rectangle} + 6*300 + 0.5(1(500)) {triangle} + 1(100) {little but not teensy rectangle} = 125 + 50 + 1800 + 250 + 100 = 2325
I think that I also left that out the first time I computed it, so let that be a lesson to me.
Jon, loving you and FAQWife even more post-update. Awww.
Loving the horror-cereal-dog-washing mathiness, but alas, my students are here.
Smooches all around.
t drive-by tacklehug for DX while sneaking out the back door
Jon, loving you and FAQWife even more post-update. Awww.
I too am gooey with the schmoop, not unlike a molten chocolate dessert of pure love.
I think, -t, (among other things, I think that I can't start a line with your name) that your calculations leave out the fact that it starts from 100 rather than from 0, so to both your triangles need to be added little rectangles, like so:
Which is why I took the average. Which basicly is chopping the triangle parts in half and rearranging them to make rectangles.
Awww. Jon I am so happy for you and FAQGirl. I can't wait to meet her someday soon.
Jon, FAQ v2.0 makes me silly with the happy for you.
not unlike a molten chocolate dessert of pure love.
Which can be used to make a nice parfait....