A vague disclaimer is nobody's friend.

Willow ,'Conversations with Dead People'


What Happens in Natter 35 Stays in Natter 35  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


bon bon - May 26, 2005 9:49:10 am PDT #7241 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

Eugene Volokh, one of the preeminent scholars on the First, says this:

If the order is as reported, then it's a blatant violation of the Free Speech Clause (because it's a speech restriction), the Free Exercise Clause (because it singles out religion for special restriction), the Establishment Clause (because it prefers some religions over others, and requires the court to decide what's a "mainstream" religion), and likely the Equal Protection Clause (because the order discriminates based on religion) and the Due Process Clause (because of the order's vagueness) as well.


§ ita § - May 26, 2005 9:58:37 am PDT #7242 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Over your math skills?

The categories currently in the running:

  • men in drag
  • animals having sex (within species)
  • household stuff

Are you banker's rounding or something?


-t - May 26, 2005 10:03:13 am PDT #7243 of 10001
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration

Are you implying fractional porn?


brenda m - May 26, 2005 10:04:47 am PDT #7244 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

household stuff

Are you banker's rounding or something?

Oh, I thought you were responding just to Le Nubian's suggestion. Which contained two. Carry on.


§ ita § - May 26, 2005 10:18:54 am PDT #7245 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Nope, I'm compiling a list of contradictory interpretations of porn. I think it's looking good. Homosexuality, animals, and inanimate objects.

Sexxay.


Wolfram - May 26, 2005 10:25:39 am PDT #7246 of 10001
Visilurking

Best of offers to you, Wolfram -- if it went as well as that, they should do what they have to to get you. (Because I decree it. In spite of all working-world evidence to the contrary.)

Problem is that it's an "entry-level" Federal position. The posting had a salary range on it, and if offered the job, I'd only be able to consider the higher levels. Fortunately the chief of the department who conducted the interview (along with 3 colleagues who came along for the gang-bang) knows that, since he himself pointed out that my current salary is higher than the range. I'm hoping that means if they liked me they won't waste my time with a low offer.


Wolfram - May 26, 2005 10:28:25 am PDT #7247 of 10001
Visilurking

Nope, I'm compiling a list of contradictory interpretations of porn. I think it's looking good. Homosexuality, animals, and inanimate objects.

I guess the third includes linoleum.


bon bon - May 26, 2005 10:30:04 am PDT #7248 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

Toothy tile is back! [link] And there's no freaking doubt who it is.


askye - May 26, 2005 10:32:29 am PDT #7249 of 10001
Thrive to spite them

Um, who is it?


Topic!Cindy - May 26, 2005 10:33:09 am PDT #7250 of 10001
What is even happening?

I don't have doubts, but I also fail to have anything resembling a clue.