Judge: Parents can't teach pagan beliefs
Fucker. Anyone in Indiana available to go thwap this guy over the head with a copy of the First Amendment?
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Judge: Parents can't teach pagan beliefs
Fucker. Anyone in Indiana available to go thwap this guy over the head with a copy of the First Amendment?
That's OUTRAGEOUS!
That is just jaw-droppingly fucked up.
The hell?
mutter, mutter, activist judges...
Jesus Christ.
Eugene Volokh, one of the preeminent scholars on the First, says this:
If the order is as reported, then it's a blatant violation of the Free Speech Clause (because it's a speech restriction), the Free Exercise Clause (because it singles out religion for special restriction), the Establishment Clause (because it prefers some religions over others, and requires the court to decide what's a "mainstream" religion), and likely the Equal Protection Clause (because the order discriminates based on religion) and the Due Process Clause (because of the order's vagueness) as well.
Over your math skills?
The categories currently in the running:
Are you banker's rounding or something?
Are you implying fractional porn?
household stuff
Are you banker's rounding or something?
Oh, I thought you were responding just to Le Nubian's suggestion. Which contained two. Carry on.
Nope, I'm compiling a list of contradictory interpretations of porn. I think it's looking good. Homosexuality, animals, and inanimate objects.
Sexxay.