Quantifyably -- we get more of them, they involve more of the body, and they tend to last longer.
Really? We get more? Isn't the assumption that every guy has an orgasm per ejaculation, whereas for women it's more of an accessory -- women can have tons of (pleasurable) and never come. Ever. In their lives.
We can stack them one on top of the other, which is certainly nice, but it's not like all women can, or all women do every time.
From the article -- Dr. Lloyd says 5-10% of women never orgasm. And Kinsey said that 39-47% of women always orgasm, but with clitoral stimulation included.
That's really not that many, assuming the guys are orgasming close to 100% of the time for completed sex acts (I'm guessing there -- feel free to disabuse me).
As for the "laying there like your brain-stem is awol" thing -- I admit, I've seen very few females orgasm, but I've certainly seen guys do that.
Sometimes there will be traffic jams for no reason, when the highway is handling significantly less that its theoretical maximum traffic.
A study found a bizarre echo effect from previous accidents in the spots where jams were appearing for no apparent reason.
We found these things in our model, just like I said, and due to the model's analysis, were able to offer a solution.
Without the physics-and-math words, the basic of it is, on a range of certain densities of cars, even the smallest noise can cause some really heavy jams. In the computer simulation, that "noise" was the 0.0000000000000001 that was rounded up or down (that's exactly how many zeroes there were there) in the computer implementation of the numeric calculations. It's the same as somebdy pressing the gas just a tiny bit less because they just leaned forward to change the station on the radio.
We also showed that once a major jam is formed, there will be remains of it for a really long time after tha cause was gone (like, say, an accident site, even hours after the road is clear again). Again, our explanation in physics-math-language came from characteristics inside the equations/model, things we could use our methods to analyze.
Heh, I thought I could shut up, but apparently, not so much.
Bless you, Nilly! I've been wondering how to find *why* that happens! The reports I heard said they hadn't found a why for it yet.
Happy Birthday, Vortex!!!
I think I missed that, earlier.
Would you all keep a good thought for Aileen and Brian? Thx.
Oh yes, Jesse. How hard for them both.
And CBS' answer to NBC's successful midseason drama "Medium" is "Ghost Whisperer," a Jennifer Love Hewitt-starring vehicle based on the work of James Van Praagh about a newlywed communicating with dead people who have not quite crossed over to the other side.
WHO IS TO BLAME FOR THIS?!?
I don't know. But the thought of JLH making the CBS schedule when Amber Tamblyn's show is nearly doomed has me making a mental inventory of my torches and axes.
P-C, it sounds like you've got some um science stuff. Yay.
I thought I could shut up, but apparently, not so much.
You're so extra adorable when you get your geek on.
In googling Massive, it seems they have modules. So you can buy:
- Massive Spectator Set
- Crowds on the Move™ - Massive's Set of Locomotion Extras
- Massive Ambient Action Set
as well as the
- Massive Combat Collection Set.
Cool! I could read about Massive all morning.
Nilly, is there a place where I can find all the physics-math etc. words? Hubby reads Scientific American for fun and likes articles where I can't even understand the titles.
Thank you, ita. Sorry, Jesse.
Sex is better than sticking a finger in your ear? I know this analogy not.
It feels better to the ear than the finger?
What tommyrot said. Tiresias is the blind seer in Oedipus Rex. He began life as a woman and was changed into a man by some caprice of the gods. He was asked which gender enjoyed sex more and said, "Stick your finger in your ear and wiggle it around. What feels better: your finger or your ear?"
I think this is rhetorically fun, but specious logic.
