We're not gonna talk about ear-fucking, are we?
Inara: I think she looks adorable. Mal: Yeah, but I never said it.
'Shindig'
What Happens in Natter 35 Stays in Natter 35
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
tommyrot - May 17, 2005 8:31:51 am PDT #4828 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Betsy HP - May 17, 2005 8:33:30 am PDT #4829 of 10001
If I only had a brain...
My favorite, favorite Massive story is about the battle crowds they created for Lord of the Rings. With their first algorithm, the soldiers' AIs told them this was a really good time to run away, so they did.
Life should be more like this.
Frankenbuddha - May 17, 2005 8:34:13 am PDT #4830 of 10001
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"
We're not gonna talk about ear-fucking, are we?
Only if it involves goats, according to the memo.
§ ita § - May 17, 2005 8:35:23 am PDT #4831 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
"In [an] early simulation [of the Massive software], Jackson and Regelous watched as several thousand characters fought like hell while, in the background, a small contingent of combatants seemed to think better of it and run away. They weren't programmed to do this. It just happened. "It was spooky," Jackson said in an interview last year."
Betsy HP - May 17, 2005 8:35:59 am PDT #4832 of 10001
If I only had a brain...
I just love living in a world that has paragraphs like this:
Massive cloth can be used to generate flowing robes, cloaks, flags and much more. The massive cloth solver is up to 10 times faster than other cloth solutions, and so stable that it can be applied to hundreds or even thousands of agents at once on a single PC.
Jesse - May 17, 2005 8:36:11 am PDT #4833 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
No problem, y'all.
Nilly - May 17, 2005 8:36:46 am PDT #4834 of 10001
Swouncing
The reports I heard said they hadn't found a why for it yet.
That's because nobody reads physics journals. We came up with an offer to time traffic lights based on our analysis, but we couldn't make anybody listen. There are big groups who do research on these topics in Germany and Japan, and they start getting heard there.
connie, this paper has the model, and this paper has the traffic lights proposal. The data regarding the obstacles and their removal was never published in such a journal. Not yet, anyway.
A krav maga instructor called me adorable. My work here is done.
DavidS - May 17, 2005 8:37:43 am PDT #4835 of 10001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
We're not gonna talk about ear-fucking, are we?
I give you a classical allusion and this is where you go.
Though now, of course, you've got me thinking about freaky sex practices in the world sex trade and ear-fucking doesn't really rate in the top 10.
Trudy Booth - May 17, 2005 8:37:56 am PDT #4836 of 10001
Greece's financial crisis threatens to take down all of Western civilization - a civilization they themselves founded. A rather tragic irony - which is something they also invented. - Jon Stewart
We can stack them one on top of the other, which is certainly nice, but it's not like all women can, or all women do every time.
From the article -- Dr. Lloyd says 5-10% of women never orgasm. And Kinsey said that 39-47% of women always orgasm, but with clitoral stimulation included
The 90-95% of women who have orgasms can have multiple ones on a fairly regular basis. For the 100% of men it's not nearly as common.
And of COURSE clitoral stimulation is included.
Steph L. - May 17, 2005 8:39:35 am PDT #4837 of 10001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine
The 90-95% of women who have orgasms can have multiple ones on a fairly regular basis.
We can? I think I wasn't issued the proper how-to guide. But good for alla the rest of you.