will take ita and Tep's word that it took its tone cues from current canon.
More or less; I kept expecting movie!Batman to be a big freaky jackhole, but then I had to keep reminding myself that this is Batman *Begins.* All the things that happened in comics canon that have further fucked him up haven't yet happened in the movieverse.
And aren't they about to have another Crisis, too? So in another year, it'll be "pre-Crises," "in-between Crises," and "post-Crises"
There's always some crisis. DCU = drama queen.
but then again, the DC universe is the one where you have to qualify time periods as "pre-Crisis" or "post-Crisis."
And aren't they about to have another Crisis, too? So in another year, it'll be "pre-Crises," "in-between Crises," and "post-Crises"
I know -- "Well, but that's pre-Crisis Batman....no, no -- I mean pre-FIRST Crisis Batman; pre-RECENT Crisis Batman is just a spooky freak."
Crisis crisis crisis. The word has no meaning anymore.
(Also, I keep misreading Batman as Bateman. I blame Christian Bale.)
Crisis crisis crisis. The word has no meaning anymore.
Coming in November 2005 -- DC presents: Infinite Tartlet!!!!
Appetizers will never be the same in the DC universe again.
Infinite Tartlet!!!!
Please (a) let this be true and (b) let it lead to Batman telling someone to stop calling him pastries.
Batman telling someone to stop calling him pastries
Oh, delicious circularity!
DC presents: Infinite Tartlet!!!!
So it all comes back to pie. I suspected as much.
(b) let it lead to Batman telling someone to stop calling him pastries.
"Why so late, donut?"
"Clark, stop calling me pastries!"
"Awwww, did my gooey apple turnover have a bad night fighting crime?"